Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Del. has a nuke plant event

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 10:45 AM
Original message
Del. has a nuke plant event


The Salem 1 nuclear reactor is shut down today because of problems with “grassing,” the blocking of cooling water intakes by vegetation, officials said. Salem 1 was manually taken off line Thursday about 4 p.m. and remains down today as operators attempt to clear debris causing the problem. Grassing is caused by vegetation such as phragmites and other weeds and grasses growing along the Delaware River’s shoreline and its tributaries becoming dislodged and floating downstream in the river. Grassing can be especially troublesome in the spring when dead vegetation moves downstream. High tides and heavy rains — like the conditions seen last weekend — can dislodge even more of the dead materials and carry them downstream. Salem 1 and its neighboring Salem 2 reactor together draw in and return 3 billion gallons of water from the river each day for cooling purposes. Hope Creek, the third reactor at the Artificial Island nuclear generating
complex here, draws in only about 58 million gallons a day from the river because the plant has a cooling tower which recirculates cooling water.

Salem 1 had been operating at reduced power — 89 percent — at the time it was shutdown after the grassing issue became more severe, according to Joe Delmar, spokesman for the plants’ operator, PSEG Nuclear. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission said today that the shutdown was handled properly. “Our resident inspectors assigned to Salem observed the shutdown from the plant’s control room and identified no concerns with operator or equipment response,” said NRC Spokesman Neil Sheehan. “The inspectors have also concluded that PSEG’s response to an increase in grassing this week was appropriate and in accordance with plant procedures used during the grassing season.” Delmar said he could not estimate when Salem 1 would return to service. “River grassing continues to be an operating challenge for the Salem plants,” Delmar said. “Our operators are trained to take
appropriate measures when need as they did yesterday to ensure the safe shutdown of the plant. “We will continue to explore opportunities to make plant modifications to lessen the impact of grassing on our plant operations,” Delmar said. The Salem 2 reactor was taken off line on April 9 for a scheduled refueling outage. Each of the reactors generates enough power for 1 million homes.
------------------------


http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ReggieVeggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. they exclusively use river water for cooling?
that doesn't make sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. 3 billion gallons a day - and when that water come out of the other end


its just lovely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's just warmer.
It is not radioactive because it never gets near the reactor. It cools the spent steam back into water through heat exchangers. All steam cycle plants (Coal, Gas, Nuclear, garbage, wood) use cooling water to condense the steam. It's simply thermodynamics at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yep, and temperature doesn't matter at all to river life.
Not at all.

:sarcasm:

(but you are right that normally there shouldn't be any significant contamination other than thermal)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. kick
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It depends on the volume of cooling water.
If the river is large enough and flows enough volume, the impact is minor. If the river has low flow, as has happened in Georgia a few summers ago, the plant is forced to reduce power to avoid killing fish. Are there irresponsible plants owners out there? yes there are. But most follow the environmental regulations that protect aquatic life.

No need for snark. I was addressing what I believed to be a reference to radiation versus heat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's common for steam condensers at any power plant.
Edited on Sat Apr-23-11 11:09 AM by NutmegYankee
Cooling towers are used if there isn't an ideal supply of water nearby to serve as a heat sink.

On edit: There are separate loops for cooling the reactor. The river water takes the heat away from the reactor cooling system through heat exchangers (a large vessel, shell, with tubes running through it such that the fluids never touch but can exchange heat) and never is in contact with the water that cools the reactor.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC