Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anti-Monopoly Laws Were a Crazy Liberal Idea

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 11:33 AM
Original message
Anti-Monopoly Laws Were a Crazy Liberal Idea
http://politicalloudmouth.com/anti-monopoly-laws-were-a-crazy-liberal-idea/

It was a time of considerable anxiety for many ordinary Americans. As the economy whip-sawed from prosperity to ruin, a few individuals just got richer and richer by controlling huge corporations that seemed to run, not just the economy, but the entire nation through the superior access that their large fortunes bought them to public officials.

The year? You guess 2011? Try 1890.

That was the year in which Congress passed the Sherman Anti-trust Act, the nation’s first major legislation to prevent the creation of monopolies, still in effect today, and the basis for federal review of mergers and acquisitions among large corporations, such as AT&T’s purchase of T-Mobile. Substantially amended during the presidency of Woodrow Wilson with the Clayton Anti-Trust Act, the Sherman Act reflects a fundamental piece of wisdom that is as relevant today as it was then: that very large concentrations of economic power threaten everyone else’s freedom, such that it is entirely reasonable to use the power of government to prevent such concentrations.

Everyone knows that “big government” is the enemy of freedom, right?

More at the link --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Jefferson, the ultimate American liberal, wanted to put anti-monopoly laws in the Constitution.
He was correct about so many things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Donnachaidh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Explains why Corporatists ultimate plan is small government
Edited on Mon Apr-11-11 11:55 AM by andym
because the power they had in the good old small government days before Sherman/Clayton Anti-Trust, Pure Food and Drug Act, Securities and Exchange Act was far greater than what they could expect from trying to obtain goodies from a corrupt big government. Grover Norquist and his successors in the Tea Party are working hard to catalyze the end of big government for "freedom's sake,"-- the freedom of corporations to return to the days of the robber barons. One exception to the call for small government will be the MIC, since the military is necessary to protect their gains. So there will still be opportunity for old-time big government corruption in the dystopia of small government which they wish to create.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why has the left completely ignored this?
Is anyone in congress speaking up on the At&t merger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC