Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Waukesha County Allowed Election Data Storage On Antiquated, Personal Computers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 11:33 AM
Original message
Waukesha County Allowed Election Data Storage On Antiquated, Personal Computers
Worth reading the entire blog. I read elsewhere that the computer in her office is an old windows 95, not connected to the internet.

Her arrogance is what worries me as well as her checkered background.


http://thepoliticalenvironment.blogspot.com/


Saturday, April 9, 2011
Waukesha County Allowed Election Data Storage On Antiquated, Personal Computers

Still an inexplicable finding about an authoritarian elections chief as reported eight months ago by Laurel Walker in the Journal Sentinel:

Waukesha — Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus' decision to go it alone in how she collects and maintains election results has some county officials raising a red flag about the integrity of the system.



Nickolaus and Cummings both said the problem stems from when Waukesha County moved its network from an old, outdated Novell server - the processing unit that multiple personal computers tap into for shared services - to a Microsoft platform. Among other things, the conversion saved the county $500,000 a year, Cummings said.

Nickolaus' election system, however, depended on the old platform, so technicians restored a lone Novell server for her use, without a backup....a major upgrade to the election system was recommended, but Nickolaus has said it's unnecessary.

In March, Nickolaus said, she moved the data off that server and into her own stand-alone system. She has a backup on a second computer, she said. In addition, she said, as she programs for elections, she does frequent backups during the day.

....................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Converting from one operating system to another .....
Edited on Sat Apr-09-11 11:49 AM by Botany
.... saves $500,000? What was the old one? 10 people in a room w/ abacuses, slide rules,
and an old fashion Franklin printing press?


What they don't have a Micro Center in Wisconsin?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shandris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I consider it an act of providence they didn't try to put it in ENIAC...
...or a Difference Engine. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Backward, outdated republicons using
backward, outdated equipment. Sounds about right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That is really funny - they have proven that their direction is backwards.
Edited on Sat Apr-09-11 12:15 PM by peacetalksforall
They want to go back before-FDR, pre-taxation, pre Roe VS Wade, and with the Habeaus Corpus they have gone back to the 10th century with the Magna Carta? Regrettably, Obama locked it in - the biggest loss of rights ever).

Their backward list is long.

So while we want to go back to paper because there is NO QUALITY all-electronic voting machine - they have GONE BACK back to OLD personal COMPUTERS?

SHould they have trouble reconciling the Tea Pary R's with the suits-tie-bluish white hair-pearl R's and the smart axe/dressed wall streeter kids - ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS RENAME IT - THE BACKWARD PARTY. Read it here first - the BACKWARD PARTY.

I'm starting a list in all the ways they go backwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. If they'd go all the way back to paper ballots,
now, that would not be so bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC