Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Students voice opposition to fragrance, smoking ban at Framingham State

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 06:58 AM
Original message
Students voice opposition to fragrance, smoking ban at Framingham State
Students voice opposition to fragrance, smoking ban at Framingham State

FRAMINGHAM (MA)

Framingham State University students yesterday rejected a proposed smoking and fragrance ban at the school, calling the idea ridiculous, an infringement on their rights and a prohibition that would be difficult to enforce.

.....

Colucci said she decided to hold the meeting after hearing complaints from several people on campus bothered by certain chemicals.

"It's a health issue," she said. "We have a responsibility to provide as healthy an environment here as possible."

University employee Lois Oak said her asthma was exacerbated to extreme levels last November after someone in her office repeatedly sprayed Lysol in the hallway. Wearing a surgical mask, Oak told the audience she now has to work from home because she can become violently ill from exposure to certain chemicals.

http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/news/education/x13021...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Strange story, starting as a ban on perfume, etc
then a reaction to the smell of Lysol, which I didn't think was a kind of perfume.

Then the Lysol-phobe wears a dust-mask, to keep the odor of Lysol away? How does that work?

What's next? Lawyers?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fragrance bans can be a godsend for people like me
My Unitarian congregation asks people not to wear fragrances at services and other church activities. This is because there are people like me who have what's called Multiple Chemical Sensitivity. I am not the only one in our congregation. Fragrances can literally make us sick.

Having MCS means you never know when you're going to be exposed to some chemical - like the artificial fragrances in commercial perfumes, hair products, soaps, laundry detergents and more - that will set off an allergic reaction and make you ill.

My MCS is relatively mild compared to other people I know. I can't use regular soap or shampoo or conditioner, because doing so would make me itch, give me a headache, make my eyes swell almost shut and possibly bring on an asthma attack.

I have to use a soap-like product called Cetaphil, and search for shampoos that don't contain sodium laureth sulfate or fragrances. I can't use regular laundry detergents because the chemicals and fragrances in them will make me itch when I wear the clothes after washing. I can't use fabric softeners. I also can't use most cosmetics like lipstick, mascara, nail polish or blush.

For cleaning the house, I must stick with baking soda, vinegar and organic products that are based on citrus oil. There is no way I can allow a fragrant air freshener in the house. I used to work Saturdays at a newspaper, when the cleaning crew would come in. After a short time, the cleaning chemicals got to me so badly that my face turned bright red and itchy. I got dizzy and started wheezing and coughing, with my eyes watering.

There's a guy in the congregation who is a biochemist, and his exposures to various chemicals gave him a severe case of MCS. He works for a federal agency, but must work at home on his computer because he can't handle being in the office with all its smells. He can't be around fresh paint -- when we painted the church worship hall, he couldn't go inside it for 2 years, even though we used low-VOC paint. He can't bring home any new electronic device -- he has to give it to a relative to keep for him until it has "aged" enough to no longer emit chemicals. If he's not careful, he ends up in the hospital with pneumonia brought on by severe allergic reaction. His MCS could literally kill him.

MCS is not a joke for us. We have to go through all sorts of contortions just to do routine things that others take for granted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Aug 23rd 2014, 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC