Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anonymous takes down Playstation website and Playstation Network

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:31 PM
Original message
Anonymous takes down Playstation website and Playstation Network
AS SURE as night follows day, Internet hacktivist group Anonymous made good on its threats and started its campaign against Sony.

Earlier this week, Anonymous publicly called out Sony over its handling of Playstation hacker George Hotz, better known by his Internet handle geohot. At the time Anonymous didn't mention who or what it would be targeting, but some obvious and very public targets have already been hit.

Anonymous claims it has successfully carried out a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack on Playstation.com, the Playstation store and the Playstation Network. However a hardcore splinter faction of Anonymous has also emerged with plans to go after Sony executives, employees and their families.

Previously Anonymous had focused on companies rather than individuals, although ACS Law's founder Andrew Crossley and HBGary Federal CEO Aaron Barr were personally tormented by the group. However the Anonymous offshoot calling itself Sony Recon is targeting not only high-ranking Sony employees but wants to gather information on their families.


http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2041179/anonym...

I'm not liking their gathering of information on Sony employees family members among other things related to this article. :mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sony was just trying to stop people from cheating while playing on-line games.
I don't understand why so many people are upset. Are people really that into cheating? So weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. You misunderstand. Jailbreaking is not to cheat it is to play
burned games on the PS3. Legally or illegally obtained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. So it's theft of intellectual property. Not okay. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #14
73. Or backing up something that you've already bought on legally purchased
media. Or you can just look at it the way they want you to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. That's what this was about? Sheesh.
Going after family members because you want to cheat--that's majorly disturbed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Someone said they want to play burned games as well. Seems petty. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. NOT cool
This is why groups like this are so dangerous, there are always factions within the group that want to take things further. Its a thin line between taking people who deserve it down a step and terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. You still don't understand that Anonymous isn't a "group?"
If you don't get it by now, you won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie and algernon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. no, a bunch of random hackers all just happened to hit playstation and sony at the same time
purely coincidental. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #27
46. I'm sorry, you'll have to some kind of point without use of the eye-rolling smiley.
That little guy is the get-out-of-jail-free card for people who have nothing worthwhile to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
38. O I understand but it is a bunch of random hackers
Who use the same name and have started something that they can not control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Which is why it was put into the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Going after family members isn't newsworthy?
Are you implying that it was included solely to create anger against Anonymous? Or is targeting family members not newsworthy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. One kid on 4chan asking if anyone got info on Stringer's kids is
not newsworthy. It's not. Is it newsworthy if an anonymous poster on DU asks a stupid question? Because if it were...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. If DU were in the process of organizing attacks on companies, and someone asked that
I would say it was newsworthy.

My biggest "problem" with Anonymous is that it can't self-police. Going after someone's kids because you don't like a business decision they make is reprehensible. Even asking for information about someone's kids because you don't like a business decision they make is vile. That one kid on 4chan should be shamed and hounded the hell out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. No I've lost all respect for them. How dare they.
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. They dare anything. They're Anonymous.
What is anyone going to do to them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Lost all respect for whom?
Anonymous isn't a group. It's a cross-section of global Internet "culture" (for lack of a better word). It doesn't have "members" or "splinter groups." Whether families are being targeted or not, this article is sloppy and exposes the writer's inability to comprehend Anonymous. Heaping scorn on "them" for this is like cursing the ocean because it has a tendency to cough up a vast, destructive wave from time to time.

Why can't the media (or average Joes, for that matter) understand this about Anonymous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Whatever - this "subgroup" are jackasses. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. This "subgroup" is nothing but some people who decided to do some stupid shit...
...and perhaps claimed to be Anonymous, as well, although I don't really see anything proving that. Yep, people targetting families are losers. But putting this on Anonymous is just a cowardly media tactic to foster the common misinterpretation of what Anonymous is.

There's not membership card. There aren't secret meetings and handshakes. Anonymous is amorphous. Anyone can be Anonymous.

Sloppy reporting feeding sloppy comprehension....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #43
50. Why are you supposing no one understands but you
How else would I say that the ones that did this are dirt bags. Please knock it off, you made your point. OK?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Yeah. We're all morons who know nothing about the Internet.
Never mind that most of us have been on it since it began, and even before on its predecessor. Some folks think they understand things better than the rest of us. It's sorta funny, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyBoring Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #53
59. That's morans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. Everyone is exposing just how little they understand.
Or how little effort they go to in expressing themselves. Either way, I won't be convinced I'm wrong to point it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Indeed. Everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. Forgive me.
Everyone I've replied to in this thread.

Sorry I wasn't specific enough. Guess that invalidates my whole position, huh, Mr. Pre-Internet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. I don't think you're wrong to point it out or clarify it
I think its helpful to be steered in the right direction. You seemed like you were getting upset because I wasn't using the correct terminology to describe what I was trying to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. I'm upset because it perpetuates a misperception that's been fostered by mainstream reporting.
Sorry, but I think the words we use have meaning, and we need to be careful that the meaning we want to convey is served well by the words we choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie and algernon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. So playstation takes out a hacker/cheater & so Anonymous members decide to go after family members?
VERY not cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. where is everyone getting cheater from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. The first reply--I'd welcome you to refute that that is the reason with
credible sourcing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie and algernon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. fine, hacker, I have to ask you, does going after a hacker, make it ok
to go after families of executives? Hell, why the fuck does going after a hacker make it ok to even launch attacks in the first place? They should all be thrown in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
36. From me. All this started with PS's new terms of service. Hackers really getting pissed
Edited on Wed Apr-06-11 07:28 PM by ZombieHorde
they would no longer be able to connect to Playstation Network (psn) with altered ps3s.

This forum is for ps3 nerds. Realize some of the posters are children.

http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/2000401-playstation-3-on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. Members?
Do you have even the SLIGHTEST understanding of Anonymous?

Members? Are you kidding me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie and algernon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. you can deny it all you want, but someone organized the playstation attacks
someone organized the attacks on the credit card companies. It wasn't like a bunch of random hackers ALL had the same idea and the same plan at the EXACT same time without ANY guidance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. Yes, SOMEONE organized all kinds of different nonsense on the Internet since it's been around.
You continue to act as though this weeks "someone" has anything to do with last week's or next week's.

Think it through, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Anonymous is an organization(?) of thugs and hoodlums.
You may like some of the things they do, but they're indiscriminate in their Internet vandalism. Someday, they'll take down a site you use.

Screw 'em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I think that was my point. And yes they sure come in handy
against giant corporations but to be vindictive against Sony and its employees and family members when the guy they did it for was so clearly in the wrong was unpardonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. OK. I repeated it, then. And no, they don't come in handy.
Thugs and hoodlums are thugs and hoodlums. I cannot support Anonymous in any way. There are legal ways to do things. A site you like is next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I got that you don't like them. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I'm not fond of any kind of criminals.
Edited on Wed Apr-06-11 07:03 PM by MineralMan
You like them when they attack someone you don't like. That's encouragement for the group as a whole. You don't get to pick and choose when it comes to hoodlums and criminals. They don't care what you think, either way.

That's why we have laws. Even Robin Hood was a criminal.

Finally, if you consider Anonymous to be engaging in civil disobedience, why are they hiding who they are? Civil disobedience involves going to jail for your actions, just like Martin Luther King did, and Gandhi and Thoreau before him. Lacking the willingness to stand up for what you do, there is no civil disobedience, only lawbreaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Actually, some laws are just flat-out fucking wrong. Period.
I don't think pot smokers, or folks who married interracially before Loving v. Virginia, or people who engaged in consensual adult gay sex in Texas before the Lawrence decision, for instance, deserve scorn. Not in any way, shape or form. But what do all those groups have in common? They are, or were, "criminals".

Simply being a criminal does not put one in the wrong. Sometimes, the law is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. We have mechanisms to change laws.
So, I guess you think Anonymous harassing families of Sony employees is OK? How would you justify that, if you don't mind? Anonymous is nothing but a bunch of hoodlums. You like them when they do something you agree with. How about when they don't? Same group. Same hoodlums.

If you don't like a law, work to change it or engage in open civil disobedience against it. Your Loving v. Virginia example is a perfect one for a law that was changed through legal action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. It was. And until it was changed, interracial couples who married were criminals.
So if an interracial couple in, say, 1920 couldn't get the law changed, immediately, were they supposed to just suck it up, because, hey, we don't want mineralman to think we're "criminals"? If a gay couple in Texas in 1985 wanted to spend some time together in the privacy of their own home, I suppose rather than having sex, they should have spent every waking second either abstaining or working to get the law changed.. because NOTHING IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN STAYING WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF THE LAW AT ALL TIMES... right?

I'm not commenting on "Anonymous" or the right-ness or wrong-ness of their actions; but I am disputing your contention that breaking all laws is equally morally unjustified, in all circumstances, and that the mere category of "criminal" somehow makes one morally deficient. It doesn't. I broke the law against smoking pot a shitload in my reckless youth. Do I regret it? No. Do I think it made me morally deficient? No. Is the law fucking absurd? Yes. Should it be changed? Yes. Will it be changed? Hopefully, but maybe not. If it isn't, it's still a bad law, because it's not the government's fucking business if consenting adults want to smoke pot in the privacy of their own homes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Civil disobedience.
Not anonymous lawbreaking. You may not be talking about Anonymous, but I am. If they want to go public and engage in open civil disobedience, I'm on their side. If they hide behind anonymity, I'm not.

I smoked dope, too. I knew I was breaking a law. I stopped when it mattered to me if I was arrested for it. Had I been caught, I'd have shrugged and though that I was caught for breaking that law.

I didn't engage in civil disobedience regarding dope smoking, except for a few legalization rallies where far too many people were openly smoking for the police to deal with. Then, I again accepted the risk.

This thread is about Anonymous. None of them are engaging in civil disobedience to try to get a law changed. That the topic of this thread. If you want to discuss inequitable laws, click the Post button and start a new thread. You'll have an ally in that thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #37
70. Actually, you made blanket statements about ALL "criminals", even fictional ones like Robin Hood.
You can't make a point and then complain when someone responds to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. not only that, but they're rude, crude, and socially unacceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
33. You also demonstrate a lack of understanding.
You even called out yourself out--"organization(?)"

"Screw 'em!" is a meaningless statement because you're directing your sentiment at a "group" that isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. As you please. They have an open meeting place where they gather.
That's an organization, just like DU is. You are part of that organization by being an active member here. The difference is that you are not really anonymous, and can be found, if necessary by law enforcement. So, you moderate your statements, perhaps. I don't know.

4Chan is the gathering place for this organization(?). The little hoodlums meet there and plan their little adventures. Some you approve of and some you may not. The fact is that they're hoodlums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #41
52. 4Chan is only an aspect of Anonymous, but sloppy reporters and sloppy consumers...
...just want to set the two concepts side-by-side and condemn away.

4Chan does, indeed, have a membership composed mostly of little creeps. But I think you've bought the media hype that 4Chan=Anonymous, and that's simply bullshit. If you want to call someone hoodlums, call out 4Chan. Lashing out at Anonymous shows that you're just eating up what the media's trying to feed you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. I've bought nothing. I've been active online since before the Internet
as we know it existed. I know exactly what's going on. As I said, you know nothing about me at all, yet you're making pronouncements about what I do and do not know.

It's not becoming to you. Truly, you do not know me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. Fella, "you don't know me" isn't an argument.
Appealing to your online longevity also shows that you have nothing meaningful to say here. I was connecting to computer networks before the Internet became available to John Q.Public, too, but for some reason I don't find that relevant in the least.

I don't need to know you to see that you're lashing out from a position of ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Scribe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #58
74. Neither is "but you just don't understand them!!!"
Repeating it over and over is especially not an argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. Remember, they do it for lulz.
Not in it for the Nobel Prize, heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. Is this the same group that was releasing classified documents and corporate documents?
Sounds like this gang has a personal vendetta against Sony.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. They're hoodlums. They act out of juvenile frustrations.
Sony? Because they're limiting their ability to steal intellectual property? Really?

Hoodlums, one and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. You don't know WTF you're talking about.
Edited on Wed Apr-06-11 07:22 PM by TroglodyteScholar
If you still talk of Anonymous in terms of judging "them," especially "one and all," you're either not too bright or have been too lazy to think clearly about what, exactly, Anonymous is.

My advice would be to get a clue before forming such a strong position.

Edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Oh, I have a clue about Anonymous. You know nothing about
me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #44
55. Yes, you've shown just how extensive your understanding is.
I don't need to know anything about you as a person to know that the words you're posting about Anonymous show a clear lack of understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. Is it the same group?
Denial of Service is a crime.

That being said, are you opposed to the release of classified documents as Wikileaks did? Also where do you stand on the release of documents from whistleblowers of corporate documents?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #40
47. I've made myself clear about that wholesale release of documents.
I'm against it. As for whistleblowers, I admire them as long as they come forward and make their case. Otherwise, not so much. Without openness, there is no civil disobedience.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #47
69. I guess that leaves us in disagreement. I see it as the whistleblowers using
Edited on Wed Apr-06-11 08:25 PM by madinmaryland
Wikileaks to make their case. In reality, what you are suggesting, is a huge deterrent to whistleblowers coming forward for the obvious reasons.

I see civil disobediance as what happened in Wisconsin over the last couple of months. I see no real comparison between the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. It's not a group at all. This should all be so obvious.
Anonymous is whoever claims to be Anonymous on a given day. What's so hard about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. I've asked a question and no one can give me a fucking answer other than
nit-pick about whether they are group or saying they are hoodlums.

:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. See my #49 below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #45
63. lol
maybe they're both. What was your question? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. See post #25. I had to go back and
reread what I posted!

Just another night in GD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
49. No. That was wikileaks. Anonymous attacks websites of which
they disapprove. Different organizations or whatever they are. They're not wikileaks. Not at all. They used wikileaks to justify some of their actions. This had nothing to do with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #49
66. Thanks. Why can't they attack that sites that send out spam emails for viagra??
Now that would be nice to see!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. +1, LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChromeFoundry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
62. Good. Sony deserves this, and more.
They brought it on themselves when they used DMCA to gather data illegally.

Fuck them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #62
72. +
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
64. Hit them in the wallet....
Sony Can Collect IP Addresses of PS3 Hacker's Site Visitors

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #64
71. They'll have no luck collecting IPs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep 02nd 2014, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC