Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why the left’s showing in Wisconsin Supreme Court race is a big deal (WAPO)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 05:27 PM
Original message
Why the left’s showing in Wisconsin Supreme Court race is a big deal (WAPO)

Why the left’s showing in Wisconsin Supreme Court race is a big deal
By Greg Sargent
In the nationally-watched Wisconsin state Supreme Court race, liberal challenger JoAnne Kloppenburg has edged ahead of conservative sitting justice David Prosser by just over 200 votes.

We still don’t know who is going to win, and we may not know for some time to come. But even if Kloppenburg loses, labor strategists argue, this will have constituted a victory for unions and Dems — proof of Scott Walker’s continuing toxicity, and of the staying power of the grassroots energy he unleashed. They’re right.

(snip)

First, the current results reflect a massive and astonishingly fast swing of support away from Prosser and in Kloppenburg’s favor. In a primary election in February (Wisconsin judicial elections are nonpartisan, and the top two primary victors face off in the general), Prosser beat Koppenburg by 30 points, 55-25. The current results show she doubled her vote share in just over six weeks, while Prosser has lost ground. This huge shift happened for one reason: Scott Walker.

Second, it’s extremely rare in Wisconsin to oust sitting Supreme Court justices. In 2008, Louis Butler was unseated, but as University of Wisconsin professor Charles Franklin points out to me, he had originally been appointed and not elected. The last time this happened before that was 44 years ago, and it only happened three times before that since the court was created in 1852.

(more at link)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/why-...


I stayed up so late waiting for returns, that I'm too tired right now to say anything but this:

.
.
.

"w00t!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unrec for bullshit article.
That article is framed to make it seem that the election isn't over. It's over and she won. If there is a recount, that's a different deal altogether.

DUer AmBlue just pointed that out very nicely here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

SHE WON!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. We all want her to win but this is ridiculous. Just this afternoon, with all
precincts already in, her lead went from 336 to 204 when AP was adjusting tallies. When you deal with small numbers like that, you can never be sure until all tallies are final and official and there are no further adjustments. Plus you have to be particularly in denial not to see the recount coming and know that small leads like that are fragile. He is right, you are wrong -- and I happen to think that she will indeed prevail in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Wrong!
You obviously didn't read the post I linked to.

The rethugs and their subservient media whores should not be allowed to frame this their way.

She got more votes, therefore, she won!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Wisconsin State Law dictates
that if the margin of victory is within .5% of the vote, the recount is mandatory.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No it's a free recount but not mandatory.
Free as in no expense to the petitioner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Good. I'm fine with a recount since it was so close.
However, she has won the election. Mmm-kay? We cannot let the rethug controlled media give the impression that the election ended in a draw. She fucking won!

The article linked to below is more honest framing of the situation. (IMO)

http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/551172/upd...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. to quote Biden, "Its a big fucking deal!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Sep 19th 2014, 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC