Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

All things being equal, whose judgment would you trust most for major policy decisions?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:46 AM
Original message
Poll question: All things being equal, whose judgment would you trust most for major policy decisions?
Edited on Thu Mar-24-11 09:55 AM by Bucky
Yes, ideally you'd have a variety of inputs into decisions. But if you suddenly Boss of American and were reduced to getting advice from only one "ideal" aide, which following credential would be most helpful to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. The one who knows the difference between "who's" and "whose."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Option 11 - Snarking fuckin' English major
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. ALL OF THE ABOVE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Don't crap out.
I agree, it's a phony conjectural question. But seriously, when you get through all the questions of which field of expertise offers a way of understanding the world better than another, which one would you call the most important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. All of the above.
The trouble is, the investment bankers and other Big Money pigs have squelched the voices of all the other citizens whose voices would make us a better nation.

I can't think of any possible good reason to choose only one of these.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. pretty much
any of the above may be a good source of advice. Good advice may come from people from all kinds of background, look how experienced Bushes team was and look how bad the advice was. It is the information you get, not who it comes from that is important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. I believe you mean...
"whose judgments, not "who's (who is) judgment".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Other - My mom
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. I was going to say 'your mom'.
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. Where are the engineers? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. That's what I was looking for
I'd like someone able to do practical things with science, though because of my limited choices I ended up with Master's Degree in History. Someone with concrete knowledge is always helpful (not that history is ever entirely concrete).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. Either the people or the dirty f*ckin hippies first!
Edited on Thu Mar-24-11 10:18 AM by grahamhgreen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Scratch a hippie, you find a sociologist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. Wow -- Those are Pretty Poor Prospects for a Single Advisor
I had to choose the History option, since historians have a better sense of what things have been tried and how they have played out.

The last person you would want to frame policy is an activist of any kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. And yet....
so far 18 of 23 respondents went with people with real life, hands-on experience over those with academic training.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Yes, But That Choice Wasn't Offered
To be an advisor, you need to be see the results of a set of policies and how to get there. And to have the perspective of a whole country among other countries.

The entrepreneur would have some experience with that, but it's very narrow -- one small enterprise vs. a whole economy. The human rights activist would be even narrower in a sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. I find the op truly silly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. Common Sense should be a requirement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
14. Library Sciences Degree
I would select someone (preferably a woman) with a degree in Library Sciences.

Such people tend to be sober in their judgments and well-versed in history, economics, sciences, and the arts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
18. A degree is a piece of paper...It would depend on who holds the degree or office...
in the case of the Union Leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. I'd Kinda Like Someone With A Piece Of Paper
I think I would prefer someone with a piece of paper saying that she had a medical degree to operate on me.

That, I think, would be much better than having someone who did not have such a piece of paper perform surgery on me.

Some pieces of paper are important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Bush had a degree in bussiness...earned with a c grade given to him...
in return for money dontaed to the college.

Some doctors, even with a degree, are so abysmally bad that I'd rather get surgery from a fireing squad.

I've known PHD's who were very inteligent pieces of shit.

Only by looking at the Person + the degree can I make a decision.

Union Leaders don't need a degree at all. But some some Union Leaders I've known have been more beholden to management than labor, so I would still need to know the person.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Michele Bachmann has a J.D. and LLM
so hard to argue against you :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Dan Quayle also has a J.D. ... Was it POtato or?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
20. Hey, I have two votes. woohoo
M.A. in economics.

I am not sure about that vote though. Some of those people can be pretty conservative. Although I remember most of my classmates being pretty liberal. Surprisingly even one of my conservative office mates sounded liberal when I contacted him in 2003. He was bashing both Bush W and Reagan. Back in grad school he was the obnoxious conservative, so it was odd that getting a PhD and a good-paying job seemed to have made him more liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
23. Woops! I voted for labor union leader. I thought we were voting for
Edited on Thu Mar-24-11 11:08 AM by JDPriestly
the ultimate decisionmaker/leader/spokesman.

I would have voted for the history expert if I had realized the question was about an aide.

History is the key to understanding what not to do. And the most common problem of advisers is that they don't know enough about what has already been done wrong.

Sorry. I guess I can't change my vote. I would have voted for the history expert.

Also, I don't think that people voted for the human rights advocate and the labor leader because of their hands-on experience but rather because of their values.

You cannot tell from a person's field of study or expertise what their values are. But you can tell from the work they choose to do -- labor union leader or human rights worker -- what their values are.

Economists are concerned about what incentives cause people to do things more than with values.

I don't think you poll provides you with the information you are drawing from it. I don't think people decided depending on whether a person had hands-on experience or not. You can't tell whether a PhD in history or economics worked in some other field before getting that degree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
27. Other: Master's degree in sexuality studies
seriesly. I have one in particular in mind. But please, people, get your minds out of the gutter: she also has a law degree. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badtoworse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. My own - nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC