Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking*** UN Votes to adopt No Fly zone - Libya

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:35 PM
Original message
Breaking*** UN Votes to adopt No Fly zone - Libya
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 05:49 PM by jannyk
10 for
0 against
5 abstentions
Carried!!!!

Live on BBC TV

China & Russia abstained (don't yet know others)

They carried the whole thing - statements/vote and now the after -statements
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Woot!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Start bombing Qadhafi forces now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who were the 5 abstentions?
Is it listed anywhere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Go to #LIbya on twitter.
I saw the names there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Twitter says: China, Russia, Brazil, India, Germany
Interesting assortment of abstainers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:48 PM
Original message
Germany? Are they have some kind of a fall out with the UK and France?
That's kinda weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
38. No, they gave a vote of confidence in their speech, they just don't want to be involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. China & Russia for sure - just happened moments ago
now making 'after vote' statements - there'll be better coverage soon I' sure.

BBC is letting us listen rather than interrupting with their own babble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:41 PM
Original message
Just found the list: China, Russia, India, Brazil, and Germany
Each for very different reasons I would imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh good, everybody else votes for us to get into another fucking war.
And we vote right along with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hooray.
And if anyone says it is about oil, they are wrong, If it was about oil, it would have happened earlier.

It is about getting rid of a murderous, plundering bastard - and it will be led by France, and the UK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. France made a very passionate and convincing appeal to UN members. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cognitive_Resonance Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Large crowds in Bhenghazi celebrating. Hope it is not too late for those brave souls. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. THIS RESOLUTION WILL NOT ALLOW EVEN AN INCH OF OCCUPATION - Lebanon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well there's our third war.
Which of our children will be paying for this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. NFZ, NO TROOPS, it'll be mostly done by France, the Dutch, the UK.
It's no more costly for us than regular exercises. Please don't spread a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReturnoftheDjedi Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. it's much more than a no fly zone. it's all measures necessary to protect the Rebels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Without boots on the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Right. That's what they say now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. It would require another resolution. What's important is the US has very little role here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. The U.S. should have NO ROLE here. Why is it we always have more than enough money
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 05:57 PM by in_cog_ni_to
for fucking wars, but no money for the needs of the people in OUR own country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. The US's role will amount to a training exercise.
Don't be silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
42. The UN will be monitoring this.
Note - it did not happen without the UN. I would not have happened without the UN. And boots on the ground will not happen because of the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #42
60. Right, it was a U.N. resolution that didn't even require Colin Powell
holding up a vial of whatever-the-hell-it-was...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #60
69. Yep, unlike the Powell demo
there had been no US deaths.

Unfortunately in the case of the Libyans there have been tens of thousands of deaths.

And threats of a massacre.

How you can compare those, is beyond my understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fittosurvive Donating Member (538 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. It could be too late...for it will still be a while before the sorties commence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. They are ready to start flying tomorrow or earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yay! More bombs and bullets!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. I know. I cannot believe DUers are supporting this and are happy about it!
Un-freakin'-real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. You haven't been following Gaddafi's genocide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #33
49. You might want to look up the meaning of genocide
and not demean the definition of the word.

Anyone who does not understand this to be about oil has their head in the sand.

The same people cheering this on cheered on Bush's invasion of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. There are reports of more than 10k people killed in a month.
Is 300+ people a day not a genocide for you? What constitutes genocide for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. "There are reports " by whom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamuti Lotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #51
68. Grozny, Sarajevo, Fallujah, Wounded Knee, Auschwitz
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 09:04 PM by Alamuti Lotus
for starters; I was in Grozny when it was overrun, I know what it really looks like. sensationalist hyperbole should not form the backbone of one's argument as it currently does. but hey you won, you got your war. the gullible and easily excitable have won the day; enjoy. or rather, I should say that the reigning imperialist power has once again exploited the gullible and easily excited to advance the 'business as usual' agenda yet again; all the same, enjoy. Britain, France, Italy, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Yemen, and the rest will show Libya a thing or two. maybe the Lebanese will get their answers about Musa Sadr, then they can bail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #33
62. I have been following it, on Catherina's threads and now yours.
I wish they had done it two weeks ago. A lot of deaths could have been prevented, and Gaddafi would be history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. Bombs are already falling on the heads of the Libyans, thanks to arms from the west.
The west should act to stop this atrocity, and they have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. This will outrage republicans in Congress....
once they can figure out how to message their opposition. It will probably be linked to 'taking orders from the UN' or some such foolish thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. It has already been stated by Rubio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. If I were a Qadhafi pilot, I'd land my plane ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
22. Resolution Bans any "Invading Force on Libyian Soil'
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 05:56 PM by jannyk
Strengthens and adds to embargo's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. +1 exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. German UN Rep: Ghadaffi's time is Over. He must relinquish power now.
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 05:54 PM by jannyk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. So we're going to war. 1st question - where are our carriers?
2nd question: Do you think Egypt will let our planes attack from their airfields?

They are right next door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. No. Egypt said no attacks from its territory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #39
50. We have plenty of ships with cruise missles in the Med.
Maybe they'll be the first wave. Before any planes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
25. UK & France alone will implement 'NO Fly Zone'
fro live BBCtv coverage

maybe some help from Arab countries, maybe not...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. The Dutch offered some planes, but yeah, good, UK and France STARTED this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. I agree, if they will be the ones leading the attacks.
And of course, they have the most national strategic interest in that oil.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. BBC says it could happen within a few hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
46. Don't bet on it - ".U.S. 'set to bomb Libya within hours' as UN approves no-fly zone"
"UK and French 'would lead first airstrike'"

"Gaddafi threatens attacks on Mediterranean targets if no fly zone enforced"


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1367357/Therell...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Aaaack! The Daily Mail is a sensation 'rag' - any other sources?
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 08:27 PM by jannyk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Gaaaa! sorry - US readying plans to enforce Libya no-fly zone
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Obama administration was readying plans to enforce a no-fly zone in Libya with the help of Arab countries, officials said Thursday as the United Nations Security Council voted to authorize the move.

These officials, who spoke after a closed-door briefing in Congress, said they expected the attempt to ground Moammar Gadhafi's air force could begin by Sunday or Monday. The effort likely would involve jet fighters, bombers and surveillance aircraft.

The disclosures came as Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said in Tunisia that a no-fly zone would include "certain actions taken to protect the planes and the pilots, including bombing targets like the Libyan defense systems."

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_US_LIBYA?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-03-17-19-26-36
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. The US was last on board, France and the UK have plans already made, the US just started planning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. USA SPEAKING NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. (USA = Susan Rice)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cognitive_Resonance Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
29. It's about helping brave people free themselves from an insane gangster who is armed to the teeth
with the proceeds from 42 years of oil revenue. The funds for Qaddafi's planes, helicopters, and bombs came from our pockets. A NFZ is the least we can do to help the Libyan people. If you have any doubt if it is the right thing to do, tune-in to AJE and look at the people of Benghazi celebrating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #29
44. Lybia has universal health care and we don't.
But look, people of Benghazi are celebrating. Let's write them a blank check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
35. Susan Rice speaking now.....
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 05:53 PM by jannyk
we voted for ....Ghadaffi systematically abuse and murder his own people....this res demands an immediate ceasefire .... calls for immediate ceasefire....bans all international flights in/out Libya....freezes assets of 7 individuals/corporations....panel of experts to monitor results.....future of Libya to be decided by people of Libya....US stands with the people of Libya as they fight for their human rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
45. As if disaster porn wasn't enough - now we'll have war porn
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 06:56 PM by Baclava
It never ends
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #45
56. The alternative is genocide porn
Gaddafi's forces will not hesitate to kill all the rebels and anyone suspected of aiding them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamuti Lotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. "genocide" has become such a cheap term -- will Qadhdhafi kill all the Arabs or something?
That's what "genocide" means.... it's kinda like "fascist", you can't just throw that kind of sensationalist hyperbole up against anybody you don't like: the word loses meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #58
66. From what I understand, it's a tribal thing
Eastern Libya comprises tribes who aren't happy about Gaddafi's rule, so he will not hesitate to slaughter a bunch of them. That might qualify as the ethnic part of genocide. But I'm not a lawyer, so...

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bighart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
54. Let the Arab League do it.
Why is it "the west" that needs to be involved at all? Saudi Arabia and UAE both have air power capable of doing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. The Arab League was pushing for it
Unbelievably, it was the US that was dragging their feet on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bighart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. My point exactly.
They wanted it let them enforce it. Why it is the job of the west to enforce when the arab league was pushing so hard for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. What I'd like to see
Is a commitment from ALL participating countries to contribute EQUAL military resources.

And NOBODY gets to pull out and let the US carry the load alone.

This is how the US gets such a bad rep as the enforcer of dubious treaties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamuti Lotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #54
61. The "Arab League" is a tool of US/Saudi imperialism, most of those states are no better right now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. That's a valid point
The whole Arab region is in a state of flux right now. Egypt is still struggling and SA and Bahrain have their own problems.

They certainly don't want to give their own citizens any ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
55. I'm shocked
I thought the rebels would be left out to dry by the world community. Although it's no guarantee the rebels will win out in the end, whoever was acting behind the scenes to get this passed deserves praise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #55
65. I thought so too. I'm still pretty cynical about the whole thing.
I told myself the world community (first world anyway) would drag its feet about the no-fly zone, giving Gaddafi every opportunity to regain power. That they would ONLY intervene if it looked like the rebels were winning anyway, and possibly not even then.

I still believe that. For the past week it has looked like they were losing ground, and Gaddafi was talking about attacking Benghazi. But he's a pathological liar and may have been in a more precarious position than most of us knew. Maybe running out of fuel? Too many defections? The U.N. undoubtedly has its own sources of information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #65
70. Beliefs; beliefs.
Gaddafi was about to pummel Benghazi to bits and pieces. He has not even brought out his biggest guns. He did not have to because the "rebels" were so poorly equipped.

If you saw the reaction to the UN statement by the rebels, you would understand the sheer relief that they were not going to lose and be massacred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #55
71. The French. Brits and Lebanese led this effort. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
67. Good News. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC