Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fukushima's Spent Fuel Rods Pose Grave Danger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:23 PM
Original message
Fukushima's Spent Fuel Rods Pose Grave Danger
http://www.thenation.com/article/159234/fukushimas-spent-fuel-rods-pose-grave-danger

Fukushima's Spent Fuel Rods Pose Grave Danger
Christian Parenti
March 15, 2011


“I’ve been studying overhead photographs of Fukushima. It is very disturbing,” said Robert Alvarez, formerly a senior policy adviser at the Energy Department under Clinton and now a senior scholar at the Institute for Policy Studies.

“The steel wall of the pool seems to show damage. All the surrounding equipment, including the two cranes, has been destroyed. There is smoke coming from reactor No. 3, and steam coming from the spent fuel pool next to it. That indicates that the water in the pool is boiling. And that means the spent fuel rods are getting hot and could start burning.”

If the spent rods start to burn, huge amounts of radioactive material would be released into the atmosphere and would disperse across the Northern Hemisphere.

Unlike the reactors, spent fuel pools are not—repeat not—housed in any sort of hardened or sealed containment structures. Rather, the fuel rods are packed tightly together in pools of water that are often several stories above ground.

“With damaged pools, we are talking about things that were never considered a credible threat,” said Alvarez.



Much, much more at link


And Alvarez was one of the 1st people I saw noting that hydrogen gas explosions and fire were major concerns:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x619287#620599
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Thanks xchrom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. ...
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrownPrinceBandar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Scary.
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. Very.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. This computer simulation from Al Jazeera does a good job explaining...
...what the situation is. Skip to 1:30 into the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxzQPiy_U1M">here.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Must watch
Thanks for posting this.
That helps make it clearer.


Am also listening to Thom Hartmann this morning and he has been discussing this extensively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Spent fuel rods....this is the
really nasty stuff.

I guess it was only a matter of time before this happened. This is going to go Global. Our poor planet and its way too many people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. See Guardian blog excerpts below
It looks like they are starting to address this more seriously.

I hope they can find a way to keep it contained.

But I share your concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. More irony
Many of us have always pointed to the storage of waste as the real problem with nuclear power, when the three major incidents in the industry's history have all stemmed from the operating plants themselves. Suddenly, we circle back to see that perhaps it IS the waste in the end that really makes it all untenable.

There's no "I told you so" snottiness from many of those who have been adamant here about not using nuclear power, and I hope we learn from this. The problem with nuclear energy is that it's dependent on having NO mistakes, not now, not anywhere, and FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS. That's simply not human reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Agree
Hanford is in my state so been aware of that for awhile.

Agree with all you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Great video
Thanks.

I don't have TV but I assume that most US channels are giving mediocre, sensationalist, conflicting reports (at least based on what I see on DU) rather than this simple, straightforward breakdown of the situation...

This video should be an OP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Shit.
I had hoped that Halfpasthuman.com would be wrong. Alas. This will circle the globe many times. Glad I don't have children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Current live Guardian blog has more info on this issue

Too much to post keeping in 4 paragraph rule, but here's the link and the headers.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2011/mar/15/japan-earthquake-and-tsunami-japan

4.40pm: An update on the plan to drop water on the pour water on reactor No. 4 at the Fukushima Daiichi power station from Kyodo News.
(I posted link to referenced article below)

4.33pm: Our science correspondent Ian Sample has this summary of what options face the operators at the Fukushima 1 power station after this morning's explosion at a third reactor and the direct release of radiation into the air from a water pool used to store spent fuel rods.
~~~

The brief release of radiation this morning from the spent fuel rod pool, at 400 millisieverts per hour, was dangerous for the workers at the site, but levels have fallen considerably since, suggesting no major release of radiation is ongoing. The spent rods are usually covered by 10m of water, but this could boil off, exposing the fuel rods to the air. Uncooled, these spent fuel rods could catch fire and release radiation directly into the atmosphere. The amount of radiation they give off will depend on how old the rods are. Older rods are less radioactive, and so less dangerous.


Link to Kyodo article:
http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2011/03/78308.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. If the new plan is to dump water, couldn't we dump something even COLDER?
Faced with these runaway reactors, Superman would simply plop icebergs on them.

Can we?

I don't suppose it's possible to drop (or spray or somehow insert) liquid nitrogen or some other super-cooled substance into/onto the reactors?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I think I saw some posts yesterday that said that would not be feasible
since too cold can cause hot material to crack and there's no way to get that large amount of liquid nitrogen to site.

You may want to search for an OP with nitrogen in the title from yesterday for more info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Crap,on that nifty chart it says No. 3 is leaking and that is the one with Mox, no? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. It is the one with Mox, but I think the explosion and leak
referred to is what happened yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Note: No. 3 used the 7% plutonium MOX
and concern is really warranted ... can he be the only one seeing that problem? They need to focus on that and cool the spent fuel there as well as in No.4

One wonders if international experts are able to get through..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Great points
I hope those experts are arriving.
They also need more personnel and supplies - see below.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12737508
According to the main Japanese news agency Kyodo, the rods were exposed when the flow of seawater into reactor number 2 stopped simply because a fire pump ran out of fuel.

With the entire region of Honshu island reportedly low on fuel and other vital supplies, a key question is whether plans are in place to keep the power station supplied with diesel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. eke
Let's hope and pray that won't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm thinking we might want to step up the search for efficient
renewable energy. We're destroying our planet with oil spills and nuclear meltdowns. I guess what the earthquakes and tsunamis don't wipe out...we will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. We need an energy initiative similar to war-time ones
such as the one that worked on an alternate to natural rubber when it became unavailable during WWII or the start up of NASA.

Bring together the top scientists, companies and environmentalists and work on solutions, incorporating as many renewable energy options as we are aware of and seeking new ones.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. You're right. And we have to do it without worrying about
oil company profits or nuclear energy company profits. We need to look at what's good for the planet and all creatures who inhabit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Absolutely agree with this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Here is a "wild idea" already done in plances like Germany
put solar panels on roofs in southern california, arizona and nevada... costs money, you betcha, but it would keep the energy needs of at least those houses covered. IT is called distributive energy distribution... but the power companies, I am sure you understand why... don't like that idea for some reason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Go visit my other thread from today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hubby has been doing same... looking at overheard
photos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
30. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC