Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

japans nuclear reactor emergency

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
rdking647 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:31 PM
Original message
japans nuclear reactor emergency
FACTS:

outside the plant they recorded radiation of .59 microseiverts. inside the control room they reached 70 microseiverts.hour or 70 millirems.
for comparison la paz bolivia (the worlds highest city) gets radiation of .23 microseiverts per hour just from natural sources. a cross country airplane flight is about 4 millirems.
a chest xray is about 8 millirems and the average american get and exposure of 360 millirems per year of which 300 millirems are from natural sources.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nice try fighting the rising tide of panic, lol.
I figure when nothing happens and a few months pass a reasonable conversation may take place. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkstar3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. The silence is deafening,
and the unrecs are obvious.

It seems no one wants facts to get in the way of an alleged nuclear drama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The nuclear lobby has their threads, everyone else has theirs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkstar3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. So you think
people are either hysterical about possible fallout, or they're part of the nuclear lobby?

Holy fuck...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think people are either *very concerned*, or have a motive not to be n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkstar3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. And so you are now ascribing a motive to me?
Edited on Fri Mar-11-11 09:59 PM by darkstar3
I'm not *very concerned* right now. I am concerned for the personal safety and sanity of the engineers currently working the problem, but at the moment I wouldn't say that I'm *very concerned* about similarities to Chernobyl or TMI.

I guess recognizing that we've made scientific progress in the field of nuclear energy means I'm part of some lobby or I have some motive, even though all I do is IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. you must be new
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkstar3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Thank you for confirming how little people read.
You know, there's a link next to every poster's name that will actually tell you whether or not that poster is "new"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. well, for whatever time it takes to discover whether this really is a disaster
or something other...

do I have to apologize for being scared shitless, and to whom?

If it's man made, it can break. just that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. The end is near.
Just kidding. Are those numbers significant? Does that mean there's no problem, or just no problem right now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
byronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, that's good to hear.
If anybody can design for this kind of thing, it's these guys. Wish 'em luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Even the Japanese government is warning of Radioactive leakage
and you want to pretend as if all is right or people should not be scared?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkstar3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Maybe we can let the Japanese work the problem and stop borrowing trouble.
There's a lot of misinformation and panic on display already. There's no reason to speculate on worst case scenarios unless you're going for dramatic effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. And nobody needs 59 more.
But not the end of the world either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. I keep hoping the vapour will not be that dangerous. My brother is 600 miles away in Kyoto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's clearly not Chernobyl. It's not good, and could turn into something like Three Mile Island...
But it's not at Three Mile Island yet, and it's not even close to Chernobyl. Hopefully, the engineers get some auxiliary generators running, get some more cooling on those reactors, and get this situation under control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
17. Wind will blow nuclear cloud to west coast. Any wind map links?
Any wind map links you know are good? I come up with land but want low atmosphere wind real-time over the Pacific Ocean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC