Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gingrich called out on his multiple divorces, adultery - whines about people focusing on his 'past'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:57 PM
Original message
Gingrich called out on his multiple divorces, adultery - whines about people focusing on his 'past'
via AMERICAblog:

Um excuse me. So family values are only what you promise to do in the future, and not what you have done in the (quite recent) past? That's a nifty new definition. We only judge people by their future promises. Not sure the religious right would agree with Newty on that one (though I do believe I recall the religious right already gave Newt a pass on his adultery, since they too are really all about GOP politics and not promoting anything they actually preach).

Now, why should you care that Newt Gingrich has had three marriages (two divorces) and at least one adulterous affair? Because Newt Gingrich cares about your marriages, to the degree that he wants to legislate them. He cares about banning gay marriages so much that just six months ago Gingrich reiterated his call for an amendment to the United States Constitution banning gay marriages.

Yes, the man who told his first wife he was divorcing her while she was recovering from cancer, Gingrich, the man who admits he was committing adultery while going after Bill Clinton for pretty much the same thing (oh, you say, it was Clinton's "lie" that Gingrich was going after? - then what do you call cheating on your wife? sounds like a lie to me.), the man who wants to now amend the US Constitution to "sanctify" marriage, wants you to ignore the fact that he's already had three marriages and at least one case of adultery.

If a Democrat had pulled a Gingrich, and claimed that their utter hypocrisy on family values, that their sexual promiscuity was irrelevant to their public agenda of chastity, Gingrich would eviscerate them.

The man is a pig. A charlatan. A hypocrite.

And a bit of a slut.

MORE:

http://www.americablog.com/2011/02/gingrich-called-out-on-his-multiple.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd like to see more 'focusing on the past'
In the future
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. People should use that line in job interviews that are going badly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. 2 affairs ..... afraid to be alone
always has one in hand before he gets rid of the other
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ed played the clip last night.
That fucker just threw out his 'faith' card. "I believe the christian god is a forgiving god..."
The crowd eagerly clapped the uncomfortableness away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Adultery is ok as long as it's with opposite people.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "Opposite adultery"?...
I think you just invented a whole, new, most excellent term :)

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC