I didn't like Rachel Maddow doing her show from that tavern.

[Archae]

For one reason.

There was too much yelling and whooping, that drowned Rachel out many times and made it hard to follow her train of thought.

[inademv]

1. Practice listening

to professors in large crowded classrooms half full of high schoolers.

[dkofos]

2. Get your hearing checked.

I have poor hearing, but I didn't have a problem hearing what she said.
I thought the sound crew did a fine job.

[madmax]

3. Yes, it was all about them. nt

[madmax]

4. I use CC and could tell she was straining. nt

[givemebackmycountry]

5. I loved it...maybe this will alter your opinion..

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x495991

[seabeyond]

6. it was really irritating. i agree. told hubby. he shrugs, and says she has fun

it isnt often, so ok.

[gateley]

8. I agree w/hubby - just posted the same thing. Sounds like a

brilliant, compassionate, wonderful man! :7 :hi:

[seabeyond]

12. he is. lol. but, so am i. i just couldnt hear what she was saying.

he grounds me. i tend to fly and spin. but then that is good for him too, in all his groundedness.

[gateley]

7. But she looked like she was having so much fun! Just as long

as it's not a nightly thing, I'll let it slide. :7

[Democrats_win]

9. Good place for our side. Where would Faux Snooze go?

Banks? A billionaire's mansion? Ghadafi's tent? A false religion "church?"

[Johonny]

10. I wouldn't like it every show

but she picked topics that it was nice to see public passion for. The "otherside" of the debate constantly show over the top emotion on these subjects. It was nice to send a message the liberal view isn't a view of convenients, it is something people hold dearly.

[Cleita]

17. Well, I doubt if it would happen on "every" show, but

was a nice change of pace to get an audience, since the MSNBC shows usually don't have a studio audience to react to the hosts.

[Warpy]

11. I didn't mind it, it was a change from a talking head at a desk

I didn't watch much of it, I admit, just tuned into the rebroadcast because someone online had mentioned it.

It was raucous but it was successful in what it attempted to do, counter the teabagger noise with a little union noise.

I'm old and I didn't have any trouble hearing her.

[seabeyond]

13. she ws good at projecting most of the time. nt

[steve2470]

14. I missed a few words she said but on the whole it was awesome

She needs to do that more often, for her own enjoyment. I could tell she loved it.

[Joey Liberal]

15. I enjoyed it! nt

[bullwinkle428]

16. I wouldn't want to see it as a nightly, or even weekly thing, but

it doesn't bother me at all on an occasional basis...let her bask in the love of her admiring fans every once in a while!

[seabeyond]

18. i really liked the part of the show she was talking abortion and the doctor ? tillman?

that got shot. and it wasnt kansas. i really liked how she told that story

[Archae]

19. I absolutely agree with you there.

Especially when she pointed out how the worst of the "pro-life" goons are from other states, like California.

[seabeyond]

20. yup. nt

[Blue_In_AK]

21. When she broadcast from an Alaska tavern

before the election, they made a point of telling everyone to keep it down when she was talking, and it seemed like we did. (You guys who watched it would probably know.) I was kind of surprised the people in Kansas were so noisy, but I could still hear Rachel okay.

[seabeyond]

22. ya. i remember that one and didnt have a problem with it. nt

[Raine]

23. It was a bit distracting, the crowd behind

her was annoying especially the one guy who kept making arm gestures. I can deal with it now and then but hope she finds a better place.

edit: typo