Right-wing hatred continues...

[Archae]

Remember when I posted the stuff from this guy, from the Fidonet?

Christians don't molest children. HOMOs do. - Tim Richardson

Why you ignorant faggot-lovin' idiot. **HOLYSMOKE** is not only a
`FLAME' echo, it harbors suck-dick faggot-lovin' idiots like you.
- Tim Richardson, Christian

Well, not only is he the type who thinks the only good Muslim is a dead one, he is a phanboi of Breitbart, and a die-hard birther.
He found annother birther, also.

(Post begins)

TR> The second issue: The president's birth certificate:

TR> Whether you know it or not....the POTUS is the highest law
TR> enforcement officer in the land. He is obligated to uphold and defend
TR> the U.S. Constitution to the letter, bound to do so by oath! His
TR> position as president demands that he be above reproach. This
TR> controversy over his birth certificate could easily be settled for
TR> all time by the president simply obtaining from Hawaii a true copy of
TR> his birth certificate

RW>All of the above is irrelevant in light of the fact that the Obama was
RW>born in Kenya to at least one US citizen. His mother (I may be mistaken,
RW>was born in Kansas) fits the requirements by the US law for residency. The
RW>one thing you might be looking for, in lieu of a birth certificate, is a
RW>form FS-240.

RW>This document, known as the Consular Report of Birth Abroad, is a basic
RW>United States citizenship document. An original FS-240 is furnished to the
RW>parents at the time the registration is approved. A Consular Report of
RW>Birth can be prepared only at a U.S. embassy or consulate.

RW>There might be a hitch in his citizenship IF his mother failed to register
RW>the birth before bringing little black sambama into the US after the
RW>birth.

RW>If there is no FS-240 filed and no birth certificate, in the least his
RW>mother's citizenship still makes him a US citizen.

Here's the problem with all that:

His father was a foreign national, but his mother was a U.S. citizen. If he
were the child of parents who were *both* born in the U.S., but he was born on
a U.S. military instalation, or embassy in a foreign country, there'd be no
problem. He'd be a citizen qualified to serve as POTUS.

If he were a child of parents where only *one* parent was a U.S. citizen but
the other was a foreign national, and he was born in a foreign country (like
Kenya), he could not serve as POTUS. If under that scenario he was born in the
U.S., he could serve as POTUS. And *thats* what makes the birth certificate so
important.

Back in the time when Hussein Obama was born, Hawaii kept birth records that
are far different than what he is putting forth as `proof' of his being born
there. A birth certificate would show the hospital he was born in, the
signature of the doctor who delivered him, the date and time of day he was
born, the names of the mother and father (if known).

He's touting a `certificate of live birth'. That means nothing. It lacks a lot
of information.

The question is.....if there's nothing wrong......why not show his proper
birth certificate? A simple request by him to the proper bureau for the proper
document would make this all go away.

There have been times in the recent past where I have been required to produce
my birth certificate to show where I was born and when. And I wasn't even
trying to run for president, only complying with bureaucratic policy.

If I have to show mine.....how come he doesn't have to show his?

(End of post)