Panel Review Questions FBI Theory in Anthrax Attacks After 9/11

[The Straight Story]

Panel Review Questions FBI Theory in Anthrax Attacks After 9/11

It's a case that's been marked by controversy and mystery for nearly a decade: who was responsible for the deadly anthrax-laced letters sent after 9/11?

Today, the National Academy of Science raised more questions.

A review panel said that the FBI overstated the scientific evidence that linked the anthrax flask controlled by Dr. Bruce E. Ivins to the anthrax used in the 2001 attack letters. Dr. Ivins, a researcher at Ft. Detrick, MD., was identified by the FBI as the primary suspect in the case. He maintained his innocence until his suicide in 2008.
..."

The review by the NAS concludes that while the anthrax in the letters was "consistent with" the RMR-1029 flask, that flask was not the "immediate source" of the spores used in the letters. The NAS found that one or more growth steps would have been required to produce the spores used in the letters. The NAS found that "the data did not rule out other possible sources" of the anthrax.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/anthrax-letters-sept-11-attacks-national-research-council/story?id=12922509

[Sinistrous]

1. I have long suspected that the FBI punted when the evidence

began pointing to a former (very) high politician as the instigator of the anthrax attacks.

[leftstreet]

2. K&R

[upi402]

3. BushCo always forgot about that - when bragging they kept America safe

Glad this hasn't been forgotten. Funny how the victims were Democrats/against the war agitprop.