|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
| LawnLover
|
Sat Dec-18-10 04:15 PM Original message |
| THIS is one of the reasons Obama compromised on tax cuts |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| Angry Dragon
|
Sat Dec-18-10 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Then it should have been in the tax bill |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DefenseLawyer
|
Sat Dec-18-10 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Do you have a shred of evidence to back that up? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pnwmom
|
Sat Dec-18-10 04:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Simple. Because we'd still be in a stand-off over the tax/stimulus bill |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DefenseLawyer
|
Sat Dec-18-10 04:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. I'll take that as a no. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WCGreen
|
Sat Dec-18-10 04:24 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 7. Good theory |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dkf
|
Sat Dec-18-10 06:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 20. True. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| phleshdef
|
Sat Dec-18-10 04:21 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 5. Why would you need a shred of evidence when a shred of common sense would suffice? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DemocratSinceBirth
|
Sat Dec-18-10 06:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 16. GOP Senators Say They Won’t Vote Until Tax Cuts Are Resolved |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Angry Dragon
|
Sat Dec-18-10 06:53 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 23. So we better start seeing jobs then |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nailzberg
|
Sun Dec-19-10 06:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 42. GOP weren't gonna cooperate until the tax cuts were extended. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aquart
|
Sat Dec-18-10 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. Sigh. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hippo_Tron
|
Sat Dec-18-10 04:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. The incoming tea-bagger congress isn't going to allow a dime to be spent on stimulus |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dkf
|
Sat Dec-18-10 06:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 21. True. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DURHAM D
|
Sat Dec-18-10 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. drivel |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bluebear
|
Sat Dec-18-10 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. Pathetic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DemocratSinceBirth
|
Sat Dec-18-10 06:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 17. Maybe He Stated It Inelegantly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AlabamaLibrul
|
Sat Dec-18-10 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. Well it's a shitty reason - was the CRA attached to a social security killer? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| L0oniX
|
Sat Dec-18-10 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. Bull shit!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| leftstreet
|
Sat Dec-18-10 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. So it's Teh Gayz fault, eh? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LawnLover
|
Sun Dec-19-10 10:14 AM Response to Reply #13 |
| 30. That's patently ridiculous |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hlthe2b
|
Sat Dec-18-10 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. As much as I want Obama to get a fair shake--this kind of spin.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LawnLover
|
Sun Dec-19-10 10:15 AM Response to Reply #14 |
| 31. Spin? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hlthe2b
|
Sun Dec-19-10 10:50 AM Response to Reply #31 |
| 37. No... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jefferson23
|
Sat Dec-18-10 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. I have seen no evidence to support this, none at all. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DemocratSinceBirth
|
Sat Dec-18-10 06:48 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 22. See Sixteen Please |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jefferson23
|
Sat Dec-18-10 07:22 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 24. I 'm aware of the information you posted and I would agree I don't know |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LawnLover
|
Sun Dec-19-10 10:21 AM Response to Reply #24 |
| 34. The OP doesn't HAVE an agenda |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jefferson23
|
Sun Dec-19-10 12:23 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 38. I'm not paranoid about anything, the agenda reference speaks only |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LawnLover
|
Sun Dec-19-10 04:20 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 40. This perhaps? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jefferson23
|
Mon Dec-20-10 09:20 AM Response to Reply #40 |
| 43. Republican planning on obstructing legislation is alway in place, that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Poboy
|
Sat Dec-18-10 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. Straw fail. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Canuckistanian
|
Sat Dec-18-10 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. No. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BzaDem
|
Sat Dec-18-10 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. DADT "probably wouldn't have passed?" Actually, it DEFINATELY would not have passed if the tax cut |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LawnLover
|
Sun Dec-19-10 10:16 AM Response to Reply #25 |
| 32. I'm not sure how much more evidence anyone needs than that. nt. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| frylock
|
Sat Dec-18-10 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 26. if that's the case them i am so pissed off at teh unemployed gays! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Stinky The Clown
|
Sat Dec-18-10 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 27. Were you being serious? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| paulk
|
Sat Dec-18-10 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. absurd |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RegieRocker
|
Sat Dec-18-10 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. Are you saying he is bargaining with terrorists (repugs)? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LawnLover
|
Sun Dec-19-10 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
| 33. Do you people live in a DU bubble? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| COLGATE4
|
Sun Dec-19-10 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
| 35. Bullshit. What can you cite that provides any support for your assertion? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LawnLover
|
Sun Dec-19-10 10:31 AM Response to Reply #35 |
| 36. Um, let's see. How about this? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Sun Dec-19-10 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 39. You can believe that if you want to, doesn't make it true. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LawnLover
|
Sun Dec-19-10 04:21 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 41. Making stuff up? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Jun 20th 2013, 02:36 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC