Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wyoming considering shariah ban in order to protect itself from it's 260 Muslims

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 05:48 PM
Original message
Wyoming considering shariah ban in order to protect itself from it's 260 Muslims
Apparently, Sharia law is such a creeping threat to Wyoming that a Republican state legislator wants to make the “Equality State” consider a constitutional amendment barring judges from considering Islamic and international law. In November, Oklahomans passed a similar amendment, which was later blocked by a federal judge over its suspect constitutional grounds.

“To date, no Wyoming court rulings have been based on Islamic law, or Shariah,” the Billings Gazette reports, “But state Rep. Gerald Gay, R-Casper, said his proposed constitutional amendment, House Joint Resolution 8, is meant as a ‘pre-emptive strike’ to ensure judges don’t rely on Shariah in cases involving, for example, arranged marriages, ‘honor killings’ or usury cases.” Gay needs approval of two-thirds of the legislature and the governor's signature to place the amendment on the 2012 ballot.

According to the 2000 Association of Religion Data Archives, Wyoming’s two Muslim congregations have 263 adherents.

In Washington, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) told conspiracy theorist Frank Gaffney that he wants to hold hearings on the creeping threat of Sharia law, and Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rep. Peter King (R-NY) is planning McCarthy-esque hearings on the country’s Muslim community.

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/wyoming-may-follow-oklahoma-and-consider-sharia-law-ban

Hey, why not just a ban using religion in courts at all? Could just clarify and say that our law is based on the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about banning all religious law?
Support separation of church and state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KatyaR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I'm all for that.
Sorry, but nothing good comes from religion, at least not these days....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wait. Does this mean that any law passed
that is in agreement with sharia law is also banned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
May Hamm Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. *GASP* Ya mean Sharia Law has already crept in???

OMG! We must act now! Pass more laws quick. We must explain that it is christian law not some other law.

We must do something before all the basic similarities of the World's religions are exposed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. ok was really concerned about this passing because it will interfer with international
corp into their state, making companies weary. not because of shariah law, but the wording may effect them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. The "international law" part is more important than the Sharia Law part
The teahadists are really fucking pissed that Ruth Bader Ginsburg quoted the International Convention on the Rights of the Child when writing a Supreme Court ruling that people could only receive life sentences for crimes committed before the age of 18 if the crime was murder, and they couldn't be sentenced to death for any reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC