Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

no bid contract awarded...AGAIN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
timo Donating Member (890 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 09:54 AM
Original message
no bid contract awarded...AGAIN
Source: ap:google news

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. government awarded a no-bid, $266 million contract for a lucrative electricity project in southern Afghanistan despite promising last year to seek competitive bids from other companies, The Associated Press has learned.


Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iaE5xbHslSjASPxJzy53M9Uch97w?docId=7ff728717dd54737a6859286c78b61b1



Heck ya, more of that CHANGE!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. They must be really terrified people, very sad.
Edited on Sun Jan-23-11 10:11 AM by RandomThoughts
If someone gets you to do something by intimidation, then that indimidating event needs to become so common it is no longer intimidating.

So if someone threatens some hardship to get a tax break, or some legislation, then if people give into that threat, the exact thing they threaten has to become a regular event so that it can not be used for intimidation.

Or people should not back down to intimidation.

Logically that seems to be the other alternative to remove the use of intimidation used against people.


So if someone threatens something, then it only occurs if someone does not call the bluff, if they go along with the idea becuase of intimidation, then the events they were threatened with should occur to stop them from thinking intimidation should be given in to.

On a side note, that is actually how it works, it is just not seen the same, since if you give into someone intimidating you, they will still do what they threaten just in a different way, or a way you think wont effect you. It can be seen to not be correct when you see the effects that occurred to the dictators that sided with the totalitarian or military side of the USA over the years. Noriega, Saddam, Marcos, The Shaw, and many others. Then again, maybe they retired to Dubai instead.

:shrug:

How would you know.


I should add that I actually talked to a guy at work at the grocery store years ago that used to work for the Justice Department many years ago that knew guys on the plane when Noriega was flown back to the USA, they said he was not even allowed to use a toilet and soiled his pants, the guy said he was terrified so maybe it didn't work out for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Meh
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bringing freedom and free electricity to the darkest corners of our world
"One day this untamed fire of freedom will reach the darkest corners of our world" - GWB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. What does your post actually mean? Please,
I'm serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Waste of taxpayer money
Edited on Sun Jan-23-11 10:40 AM by somone
The electricity generated will just be another source of income for corrupt authorities - or the Taliban/Al-Qaeda (that is, if they don't sabotage it).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thanks, I agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Commander in Chief has the authority to correct such egregious abuses of the trust placed in him by
We the People.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timo Donating Member (890 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. he does
but lacks the testicular fortitude to do so!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC