Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SEC sues over Heinz option trading before buyout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-13 11:33 PM
Original message
SEC sues over Heinz option trading before buyout

SEC sues over Heinz option trading before buyout



By Ben Berkowitz

Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:52pm EST

(Reuters) - Securities regulators filed suit on Friday against unknown traders in the options of ketchup maker H.J. Heinz Co, alleging they traded on inside information before the company announced a deal to be acquired for $23 billion by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc and Brazil's 3G Capital.

The suit marks the second time in six months that the SEC has taken legal action for alleged insider trading on a 3G deal.

The suit, in federal court in Manhattan, cites "highly suspicious trading" in Heinz call options just prior to the February 14 announcement of the deal. The regulator has frequently in past filed suit against unnamed individuals where it has evidence of wrongdoing, but is still trying to uncover the identities of those involved.

That trading, the suit said, caused the price of the particular call option they bought to soar 1,700 percent and generated unrealized profits of more than $1.7 million.

The regulator claims the traders are either in, or trading through accounts in, Zurich, Switzerland. The account had no history of trading in Heinz over the last six or so months.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/16/us-heinz-berk...

Lawsuit? Why not a criminal prosecution?

Ah, those crooks! Er, I mean, shrewd investors.


Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-13 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. I like your short yet accurate editorial.
Yeah. Why a lawsuit? Shouldn't the SEC get a search warrant and go in full force? They didn't show Martha Stewart such consideration. WTF? It's a new age! The new world order that Bush Sr. spoke of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-13 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, it was very important to make an example of Martha Stewart.
Why, I have no idea. But, clearly, it was more important than stopping Bernie Madoff. One trader alone went to the SEC three times about Madoff because his customers and employers were complaining that he was not producing the results that Madoff was producing. He said he explained to them exactly what Madoff was doing and how he was doing it. But the SEC could not seem to find any wrongdoing.

After all, how can we expect regulators in this millenium to see through a Ponzi scheme? That's so 20th century!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Oct 21st 2014, 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC