Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Panetta: Cuts, freezes possible in March

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-13 01:35 AM
Original message
Panetta: Cuts, freezes possible in March
Published: Jan. 11, 2013 at 12:04 PM

WASHINGTON, Jan. 11 (UPI) -- U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said he ordered the agency to prepare for the possible triple threat of spending cuts, no operating budget and debt default.

Panetta said the "perfect storm" could force the U.S. military into the worst possible scenario, a "hollow force," Politico reported.

He said the Pentagon would ratchet back on non-critical military maintenance, freeze civilian hiring along with furloughing civilian employees, stop issuing certain contracts and take "other steps" to counter the possibility of a roughly $45 billion in spending cuts that could go into effect in March unless Congress acts.

Panetta and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey said March's potential across-the-board budget cuts, the expiration of the continuing spending resolution that keeps government operating and the possibility the country could breach its debt limit required such preparation.

" at all three of those, we have no idea what the hell's going to happen," said Panetta, who's leaving as soon as his successor is confirmed. "All told this uncertainty, if left unresolved by the Congress, will seriously harm our military readiness."


Read more: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2013/01/11/Panetta-Cuts-...


I thought he couldn't wait to get back to growing his nuts? Why is he still bloviating?

Helping out the boss before he goes with one more dire warning about how military spending can't be cut.

Wouldn't want the value of Cheney's Halliburton stock to go down, now would we?

Besides, if it weren't for weapons and guns, what would our manufacturing consist of, a bunch of teeny cottage industries?


Panetta claims he left the Republican Party in 1971 because it had become too far right. LOL, it was at least four times more left than the Democratic Party is today, but that never seems to have gave Panetta any pause


I find it impossible to believe him.

After all, when Panetta became old enough to to vote for the first time, FDR was in office and the last Republican President had been Hoover. So, the Republican Party that Panetta had chosen to join was the Party of Hoover.

As far as nominating and electing Presidents, it went from Hoover to Eisenhower, whose Vice President for 8 years had been Richard Nixon.

Meanwhile, the Democratic Party had gone from FDR to JFK, with his wimpy Peace Corps and space program and his civil rights stirrings. Then, all too soon to LBJ, with all that Great Society/War on Poverty legislation, a domestic package possibly more far reaching, more forward-looking-- and more socialist--than the New Deal.

And from LBJ to choosing whether to nominate Gene McCarthy or George McGovern, who lost every state in the nation, including his home state, except for Massachusetts. So, not only the Republican Party, but a lot of Blue states had turned to Nixon

Nixon was inaugurated for the first time in January 1969. Meanwhile, Panetta has been working for a Republican Senator and then goes to work in 1969 as assistant to Nixon's cabinet secretary for HEW.

And, at some point in 1971, Panetta says to himself, I loved me some Hoover and some Eisenhower/Nixon. But, after a year and some months, it has become plain to me that Nixon/Agnew And, sometime with the next is in office for barely a year, Panetta says to himself, well, I was okay with Hoover and 8 years of Eisenhower/Nixon, but a year of Nixon/Agnew is so much further to the right than Hoover and Eisenhower/Nixon. It's become obvious that I have moe kinship with the Party of FDR, LBJ, McCarthy and McGovern."

And, even when the party of FDR, McCarthy and McGoven beomes the Party of Clinton and Obama, both of whom are to the right of Nixon, Panetta has no problem working his way up in both administrations. And leaving his own office afer all these years in politics trying to scare people into leaving military spending alone and making sure cuts are pretty confined to "entitlements."

Yeah, I call bullshit.
Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-13 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. I watched Panetta on TV when
he said, "Don't cut the military, cut entitlements instead." Seriously. Still a Republican, like the rest of those I won't name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-13 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, there is also pushing the position of his employer........
Edited on Mon Jan-14-13 07:23 AM by No Elephants
But, I agree, I don't care which letter is behind the name.

If you are shilling for cutting entitlements, you are no Democrat.

You know, when Republicans find it so easy to vote for a Democrat, as did Julie Eisenhower, Colin Polin and so many others, something is very wrong for Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-13 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. This is good!
"You know, when Republicans find it so easy to vote for a Democrat, as did Julie Eisenhower, Colin Polin and so many others, something is very wrong for Democrats."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Aug 30th 2014, 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC