Watching self-proclaimed progressives attack and malign a courageous whistleblower, while defending the US military's patently abusive detention practices and steadfastly defending the government's extreme secrecy powers, is one of the most potent symbols of the Obama presidency.
An equally potent symbol is that at the very same time that Bradley Manning is prosecuted and threatened with life in prison for exposing serious war crimes, a government official who supported if not participated in those war crimes is being promoted to CIA director. This takes place in the same week when, as FAIR put it on Monday, "the only person to do time for the CIA's torture policies appears to be a guy who spoke publicly about them, not any of the people who did the actual torturing.
As usual, those who commit serious crimes in government are not punished but rather rewarded. Only those who expose those crimes are punished. That's the story of Bradley Manning, and what makes it all the more remarkable and telling are the hordes of Democrats who have spent several years justifying and cheering for this.
Yesterday, as noted, the military judge reduced Manning's sentence (if he's found guilty) by four months. But today, the same judge yet again pushed back the start of his trial by a total of three months, which consigns him to another three months in prison without being convicted.
By all means, take your time: it's only been 2 years and 8 months since he was arrested, all of which he has spent in a cage despite not having been convicted of anything. No reason to rush yourself in starting the trial.
6. I am not taking it as gospel yet. I read it on a message board. I am just asking.
But it would add another dimension to the nudity, just as dogs added another dimension in Abu Gharaib because observant Muslims must pray several times a day, but cannot ever allow dogs into the place where they pray.
8. I don't know either, but I don't see an Adam's apple in the photo either.
As I am sure you know, some females who go through the surgeries, or at least some of the treatments, to end up as males are attracted to males after the surgery, but as homosexuals. And males who go through a transgender process to become females are attracted to females, but as lesbians.
In fact all kinds of things happen that would not be your first guess.
Or, at least, so it seems from talk shows I've watched and stories I've read. I have not researched statistics.
I just have heard so many talk show hosts ask, "Why did you not just stay a female and date males? And the answer always is some variation of "Because, except for the exterior, which I hated having to have, I was just not a female.)
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.