Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP spins for Michelle Rhee. Defends her DC schools time with study by her own group.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-12 12:39 PM
Original message
WP spins for Michelle Rhee. Defends her DC schools time with study by her own group.
The Washington Post editorial links to the site that did the study, but fails to mention that Michelle Rhee was its founder and leader for ten years. She founded The New Teacher Project in 1997.

The New Teacher Project (TNTP) is an organization with a mission of ensuring that poor and minority students get equal access to effective teachers. It attempts to help urban school districts and states recruit and train new teachers, staff challenged schools, design evaluation systems, and retain teachers who have demonstrated the ability to raise student achievement. TNTP is a non-profit organization and was founded by Michelle Rhee in 1997.


Makes it hard for me to accept what they say as convincing.

Here is the editorial from the Washington Post.

REMEMBER THE predictions that former D.C. Public Schools chancellor Michelle A. Rhees overhaul of teacher evaluation and compensation would lead to damaging upheaval? That there would be an exodus of good teachers? Those claims like much of the criticism of D.C. school reform have been proven baseless: Three years of dramatic change in personnel policy has made the District a model for smart teacher retention.

A study released this week by the nonprofit New Teacher Project lauds the District for its record of retaining good teachers while shedding low performers. Most school districts, as the group has established in previous reports, retain their best and worst teachers at similar rates. Its the result of a cookie-cutter approach to personnel that enshrines mediocrity, tolerates ineffectiveness and has terrible consequences for students.


If a paper runs an editorial praising a study vindicating Rhee, then they should reveal that the group was founded and run by her for 10 years.

My own opinion, for what it's worth. I think that aside from anything else she is doing, all the anti-teacher, anti-union activities in many states...including my own...she should NEVER be forgiven for this horrible ad which ran during the Olympics and ridiculed our country's public education.

It was created by her present group Students First, and they still proudly defend it.

View it at You Tube

Then take another moment to view their video defense of that insulting ad.

Rhee's Students First defends Olympic ad

Worse than the ad itself.
Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-12 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Union Busting and elimination of Tenure and Benefits
To Rhee, Teachers are a commodity, like pencils and paper. When Teachers cease to be useful, they are replaced with a fresh one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-12 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Rhee's Students First bears more than a passing resemblance
to other groups with similar destructive agendas like Freedom Works and the Heritage Foundation. This can't simply be a coincidence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-12 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Reminds me of my mom, an incredible cook, when she would take her first
Edited on Mon Nov-12-12 08:33 AM by No Elephants
bite of a meal she had just made and served, then exclaim, "Mmmmm. Our food is tasty!"

I never knew whether she met the kind of cuisine in general or was referring to her very own cooking, using the royal plural.

In any event, it always made me chuckle inside.

Poignant personal memories aside, praising yourself is fine only if the source of the praise is totally obvious, as it was when my mom praised herself to no one in particular at the family dinner table. Otherwise, it is highly unethical.

But, when has Rhee shown a concern for ethics?

Then again, Rhee is Rhee and I can do nothing about her directly.

My concern is with federal, state and local governments, all of which are acting as though charter schools are the best things for kids since the Salk vaccine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Aug 28th 2014, 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC