An article at RH Reality Check suggests he might be doing that. He had planned to sign the bill, most likely to make sure he is re-elected in a red state. But it's such a horrible bill, maybe he is reconsidering.
Is McDonnell Now Backing Away From a State-Sanctioned Rape Bill?At first I thought the use of the word rape was extreme. However there is a picture at another link at RH Reality Check
of the procedure. It is looking to me like it is penetration being forced on a woman if she wants an abortion. Unnecessary and humiliating.
Back to McDonnell's stance now:
Virginia Governor McDonnell signaled his intent to sign one of the most despicable bills in the country that would force women to undergo a trans-vaginal ultrasound against her will in order to obtain an abortion. Or in other words, a bill authorizing state-sanctioned rape. But after speaking with Jeff Caldwell, McDonnell’s press secretary, it seems the Governor is not so eager to go on the record with his previously-held position.
I asked Caldwell if the governor really intended to sign a bill that met the standard of Virginia's rape statute. When put in those terms it seemed the Governor’s office balked.
“The governor will review it if it passes and will see what the final language of the bill is,” said Caldwell.
I pressed and asked Caldwell if this is a new position for McDonnell, if he was backing off a bit as his statement suggested. Mr. Caldwell flatly said, “No, he’s generally a pro-life candidate, I don’t think we are being inconsistent.” (Generally?)
He is a Democratic governor, and I believe Democrats should not force such bills on women.
Today I posted at Daily Kos in a post that is being mostly loudly ignored....that the party has chosen not to stand up for women through the years. Some have of course, but it has been more of a priority to win in red states than to take stances for women's rights.
How the denigration of the word "liberal" and the politicalization of women's rights are connected. I have been wondering how we got to the place in this country when there is such a public and raging debate over the fate of women and birth control and abortion. It is as though we were going backwards in time.
That is really the fault of both parties through the years. I noticed it first in 2003. Those of us who became so active in politics with the Dean campaign were called liberals and scorned as fringe activists. It was stunning, and it carried right down to the local level. And it was not the Republicans who did that, it was our own party.
Actually some Democratic strategists started back in 1985, devising a plan that would distance the party from the ""the new bosses"-organized labor, feminists, and other progressive constituency groups-that were keeping the party from modernizing."
As one of the centrist Dem strategists said: "We respect the struggles of the feminist movement, the civil rights movement and Vietnam, but (we) are not defined by those struggles," says Kirsten Powers, 37, a New York-based strategist and commentator for Fox News. "We want to take what is good in liberalism and make it better, and get rid of what is not working."
That's just it.
Our party should be defined by standing up for women's rights.When things like this trans-vaginal ultrasound come into the public venue....there should be Democrats all over the radio and TV denouncing it.
I don't see them.