Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Durbin admits: " Gov. has been using Soc. Sec. funds to pay for other programs".

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 07:05 AM
Original message
Durbin admits: " Gov. has been using Soc. Sec. funds to pay for other programs".
Full quote:
Senator Dick Durbin, the chamber’s second-ranking Democrat, also rejected the complaints.
He said the government has been borrowing surplus Social Security revenue to pay for other programs,
and promising to repay it later with other tax revenue, so the money has already been mixed.

“This is not the first time,” he said.

This comment buried in a long story about Pres. Obama's plan to extend Soc Sec tax cuts.
Which is well worth the read itself.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-05/payroll-tax-cuts-seen-by-some-obama-allies-as-undermining-social-security.html

How the government realistically plans to both reduce funding of the Soc Sec program
while spending the money it does take in for other programs
AND paying that created debt from future revenues during a severe recession is beyond logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. With no intentions of paying it back
They will just kill the program rather than honor the commitment.

Lying thieves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I have no doubt that has been the plan all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. It is called "starve the beast".
It is a Republican strategy that was first suggested by Newt Gingrich in the early 1990s but not fully implemented until the selection of George W Bush as President. It is a real policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. They stole it fair and square
Insisting that the beneficiaries give it back is class warfare, bub!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. LOL...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. The logic is simple: steal the Social Security trust fund and everything else possible....
... forget paying the debt; just dump it on the People.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yet WE continue paying our debts to the banks.
I think there is something seriously wrong with our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. You always were quick on the pick-up. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Glad you could join the team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
28. We are the only ones with actual consequences for not paying.
If we don't pay, they take the house and the car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. There is no such thing as debt
when you own the $ printing press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. So we citizens who are employed and having payroll taxes taken out of our pay
by the government, with the understanding that the money will eventually be available for our retirements, are being scammed. The government is taking our money, misrepresenting itself, and using the money for whatever they want.

Is this a basis for a class action lawsuit? The entire working population vs the government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sagesnow Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Which lawyer will take this case up?
Are there any lawyers that specalize in SS class action cases? How do we get this going? Maybe we need to occupy Social Security. (Can you tell this really infuriates me? :mad:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. +!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildNovember Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. It also means that we pay higher federal income taxes than they keep telling us we do.
Edited on Wed Dec-07-11 01:33 AM by WildNovember
And the rich pay a lower percent of the total than they keep telling us they do.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
30. There is no case.
There is no promise, no guarantee, that you will ever get anything out of SS. This is a well-established matter. SS is much more comparable to an insurance policy than a pension. You pay "premiums" all your working life with no guarantee of ever seeing any benefit from the program.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. that's been common knowledge
. . . they'll pay for it by shifting priorities from tax cuts for the wealthy and spending on military nonsense to the commitment they claim to have to keeping SS solvent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. Where are the plans to Primary Obama?
Edited on Tue Dec-06-11 07:55 AM by RC
It is obvious he is part of the problem. Payroll taxes are separate from general revenue funds for this very reason. And now they are being commingled anyway. That is only one of the real reasons for the payroll tax cuts and not what we are being lead to believe. In other words, these payroll tax cuts while sellable in the short run, they are very bad for us in the long run.
Ever notice how the talking points for the payroll tax cuts are similar to the talking points for not taxing he rich? Yeah, jobs again. We already know what not taxing the rich did for job creation. Now we are being sold the same lies for keeping the payroll tax cuts.
We are being had again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOHICA12 Donating Member (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. Hey, the $1,000 has been nice this year .... but way stupid.
Tossed it into the 401K cause I hate getting adjusted to one income to have it reduced by Washington, Kids growing up & out, etc. The tax reduction has to end at some point - and then the wailing & gnashing of teeth. Again - really stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. So...time to keep buying into incorrect right-wing framing then?
The fact that social security bought government debt didn't reduce government debt. All it did was change who is owed the debt.

The only way this situation could be a problem is if the interest rate on debt was unsustainable. But we're issuing new debt at less than 2%. Inflation-protected bonds are paying negative interest.

The sky is not falling. Claiming that a disaster is looming just makes it easier to destroy the program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. There is no right-wing framing going on. It just happens that a right-winger has finally admitted
what everyone with a brain already knew was going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I'm afraid you have that backwards
Since you're "the one with the brain", perhaps you could explain how there is more government debt right now due to social security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Either you misunderstood the OP, or you're trying to change the subject. The OP states that
SS was raped to help pay for other government programs. As soon as you use SS fund money to purchase treasuries, you've used the money to pay for other programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #32
44. So...you have no idea what the trust fund is then?
The trust fund, by law, can only purchase US treasuries. This has always been the case, so it isn't some new, nefarious Republican way to destroy it. So no, it hasn't been "raped to help pay for other government programs". It was invested in the only bonds it is allowed to buy.

Did you think that the trust fund was just a pile of cash sitting in a vault somewhere?

Redeeming those bonds does nothing to our debt. It means debt must be sold to someone else. Total debt will not go up. The only danger is if we can't sell that debt at a low enough interest rate. With interest rates below 2%, that's not much of a fear for now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-11 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. When you buy treasuries, you're buying debt. I will also point out that the fund has been
"borrowed from" to help close budget loopholes. Borrowing from SS is how Clinton balanced the budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. There's never a lockbox around when you need one.
:mad:

I will never forget the way the corporate hoore media and the GOPers ridiculed Gore during the 2000 election. Fuck every last one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
15. I really think a couple of law professors and students should take a look at this.
Can we sue the government to put the money back in the trust fund?

I would think every taxpayer who has paid into social security would have standing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. +1!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
16. Stolen, not "mixed".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. Thank you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
22. Gore was right... once again...
we needed a lock box...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I was just thinking that
Gore was right about climate change wayyyy before most as well. Did you catch Cenk's interview with Gore on The Young Turks on Current last night? It was excellent.

Link to video if ya missed it: http://current.com/shows/the-young-turks/videos/al-gore-gop-primaries-are-troubling-exercise-that-drive-candidates-to-absurd-policy-positions

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. There is an alternate Universe where Gore served 8 years, followed
by Hillary Clinton...

I would imagine it is in better shape...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Yeah I'm pretty positive we never would have gone to war in Iraq
and for the most part I think Gore is a pretty decent guy. I voted for him. I'd like to see the alternate world where the Kennedys lived and the Bush family never came to power. How cool would that be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. In an infinite number of universes there is one
Literally that was the feeling I had after 2000... I had entered an alternate universe. I was right... it all turned-out so ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Do you watch Fringe?
In the alternate universe there JFK lived and the twin towers still stand. - Oh and Obama is president there too. :)

Here is the best shot I can find that shows it - in the top left corner of the paper you see "Former Pres Kennedy to Address the UN" and the other pic is of one of the characters standing in the twin towers in the alt universe. I love this type stuff. :evilgrin:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. That show hasn't made it over here yet to the UAE
However, am a long time Dr. Who fan...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Me too!
I've seen every episode of Doctor Who starting from the first ep with Jon Pertwee as The Doctor all the way up to the current ep. Well I did skip some Colin Baker eps but who didn't? :P

Woops sorry for spoiling a bit of Fringe - didn't know it hadn't aired there. It's in season 4 here. It's a good show - not always great - but I feel it's been worth my time.

Have you seen the short prequel for this year's Doctor Who Christmas special? Here's a link: Doctor Who: The Prequel to The Doctor, The Widow and The Wardrobe - BBC One -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfJkFtqYQ3Q

Also - if UAE is not current with Doctor Who - every ep can be found on sites like filesonic and megaupload. cheers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Need to watch the 'Preview' ... my geeky
family has been working its way through episodes of Dexter, Boardwalk Empire and Walking Dead... We also need to finish Battlestar Galactica.

Did you read that they are discussing a Dr. Who movie (Hollywood) for next year...? Mixed emotions about that...

Ironically, I saw my first Dr. Episodes in black and write during the early 1970's. (Jon Pertwee) and the show scared the bejesus out of me (I was only 5 or 6). I didn't stop watching though.

Maybe 6-7 years later they started running Tom Baker on PBS and I started watching again. I haven't stopped since and my daughters are now hooked. We are also huge Torchwood fans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. Sounds like we have similar tastes
i too watch Dexter and The Walking Dead. Battlestar ended up being one of my favorite shows ever. Caprica was quite good during its 18 episode run as well. You should check out Carnivale if you haven't - the showrunner for season one was Battlestar's showrunner Ron Moore. And season 2 was just as good.

Yeah i don't know about the movie idea either - as long as it stars either a current or past doctor i'd be ok with it. DW showrunner Stephen Moffat says that will be the case - but the guy they've hired to direct wants to go with a whole new cast. ugh. i think Moffat will win that battle.

i loved Torchwood - Children of Earth. the rest i've had mixed feelings about. my other sci-fi love was Farscape - wow what a show. and The Invisible Man was excellent as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-11 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
35. It's been a SLUSH FUND for elite use -- for tax cuts for rich -- etal --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
39. Why am I surprised!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
40. I don't think it is beyond logic.
We will spend much less when the troops come home from Iraq and Afghanistan, starting in January.
I think the disconnect surrounds the idea that money borrowed from one fund can't be repaid to the fund if all funds are reduced.
But, Social Security won't be reduced, so it is unaffected by those cuts.

It is just simple math.
It all adds up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
42. I posted a Washington Post graphic ("Lying with Statistics") about this during debt-ceiling debate.
I'll have to dig it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
43. Hey, tax cuts don't fund themselves!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC