Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans Are Set To Raise Taxes On 160 Million Members of the 99%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Galraedia Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 03:28 PM
Original message
Republicans Are Set To Raise Taxes On 160 Million Members of the 99%
The ongoing class war started by Republicans on behalf of the richest 1% of Americans against the rest of the country has been the focus of the Occupy movement since its inception. Throughout the past two months, Republicans have ramped up their assault on the 99% by failing to consider raising taxes on the wealthy to help reduce the deficit and pay for President Obama’s crucial job creation plans. The failure of the super committee tasked with reducing the nation’s deficit lies solely with Republicans who refused to even consider increasing taxes on the wealthy as a balanced approach to deficit reduction, and instead, they proposed decreasing the wealthy’s tax liability while cutting social safety net funding as part of their perpetual slash and burn agenda to preserve the status quo that is increasing the number of Americans living at or barely above the poverty level.

Two of the casualties of the super committee’s failure was extending unemployment benefits for out-of- work Americans and the payroll tax cut that affects every American earning less than $106,800 annually. Congress has an opportunity to extend and increase the payroll tax cut before the Christmas break and Republicans have another opportunity to prove to the American people that their loyalty is not exclusive to the wealthiest 1% of Americans. If recent history is any indication, a good bet is that recalcitrant Republicans will refuse to show due consideration to the plight of Americans struggling in this sluggish economy to protect the wealthy.

In order to procure the current one-year payroll tax cut and unemployment insurance extension, President Obama agreed to extend the Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthy for two years during negotiations last December. The payroll tax cut reduced employee contributions to Social Security from 6.2% down to 4.2% and the result was immediate relief for Americans who most certainly used the extra cash for such luxuries as food, shelter, and daily necessities. This week, a new bill sponsored by Senator Bob Casey (D-PA) will expand and extend the payroll tax cut that provides middle and lower income workers with extra cash in every paycheck that will stimulate the economy and help cash-strapped Americans survive; if they have jobs.

Casey’s bill extends the payroll tax cut for another year as well as increase the cut by more than 50%. The new payroll tax cut is an increase from the current 4.2% down to 3.1%; the regular rate is 6.2% and is a substantial savings for working Americans. The new bill also gives relief to employers who currently pay the regular matching payroll tax of 6.2%, and the new figure cuts their contribution in half at 3.1% for all of 2012 on the first $5 million of payroll. The $5 million limitation affects 98% of all employers and avoids giving giant corporations who are sitting on record amounts of cash more benefits than they already receive. It is difficult to imagine any Republican opposing a tax cut that benefits 98% of all wage earners until one considers the issue of funding the tax cuts.

Read more: http://www.politicususa.com/en/gop-payroll-tax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Payroll tax cut SHOULD expire. It was a terrible idea that undermines SS
we should have continued the earned income tax credit instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. SS never misses a dollar. That $ is replaced with $ from the General fund. SS is not undermined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I believe there is a law that says SS can not add to the deficit
coming out of the general fund is adding
and I agree with the first poster --it is stupid and dumb idea to begin with
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is a great example of how Democrats are experts at shooting themselves in the foot even when
they have a winning issue and a policy that is VERY progressive. It helps people who don't make a lot of money - who can truly use the extra cash in every paycheck. :

Don't ever complain about the Democrats being unable to push a winning message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. My worry is that the democrats have opened the door with more
tinkering with SS in the future ....... once the door is open it is harder to close it
raise the top tax rates .... that is where the money is
until that is done nothing will change in this country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Well, maybe not in the way you think...
But when general revenue dollars are put into SS rather than payroll deductions it certainly creates a situation that is immediately translated into a right-wing talking point.

It is unfortunately true that reality is rather less the problem than is perception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Doesn't matter if the $ is replaced. Now SS is not separately financed
which opens it up to privatization, more cuts, etc. Do we really want SS competing with other programs for limited federal dollars? There are much better ways to get stimulus. This ain't it. Oh and Obama swore up and down it would only be a year. Now he wants to double it. Bad BAD precedent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Do you remember a time when Republicans pretended they cared about the working class?
It wasn't all that long ago that they would show their left hand that held promise of relief for working families while the right was busy jerking off their corporate masters. Even GW Bush a dozen short years ago felt it necessary to run as a "compassionate conservative" to appeal to the masses who feared a stern Republican rule.

Now the party has dropped all pretension of representing anyone who punches a time clock to work full time on satisfying the needs of the few. While the Democratic Party may not be the same ol' mule it used to be, at least it has their Kucinich, Sherrod Brown, Pelosi, and many many others who are still sincere in their efforts to serve those who can't afford to send them on golf junkets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. kicked. A real test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC