Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF is a "AC-130 helicopter gunship"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 07:41 AM
Original message
WTF is a "AC-130 helicopter gunship"?
Edited on Tue Nov-29-11 07:46 AM by unhappycamper
Is it like an Osprey? Or is the Associated Press and Ms. Dozier blissfully unaware about military toys? Or perhaps somebody in the Pentagon had to write this article quickly without fact checking?

:wtf:

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2011/11/ap-pakistan-afghanistan-mistaken-identity-could-cause-fatal-raid-112811/


on edit to add: This is what an AC-130 looks like:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's a top-secret weapon
Well, it was a secret until the AP spilled the beans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. That picture in the OP is pretty old. I remember a thread about it at least 3 years ago
So "top secret" may be an exaggeration. And I know how you loathe exaggeration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's simple
Engines 1 and 2 at full throttle and full forward propeller pitch.

Engines 3 and 4 and full throttle and full aft propeller pitch.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. ..
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. lol
Are they numbered that way? On a ship the left engines would be 1 and 3 the right would be 2 and 4, or the other way, IIRC port is odd numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I always understood that they were numbered sequentially.
I have pics someplace of a C-130 cockpit (traveling Air Force display) and the fuel-management control board (a fairly complex item) simply numbered them 1, 2, 3, and 4.



My kid spent a LOT of time in that cockpit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I have no idea, which is why I asked. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. krispos is correct.
Edited on Tue Nov-29-11 07:16 PM by PavePusher
Aircraft engines generally numbered sequentially from crews' left to right.

I've spent a lot of time on those, as well. (Former maintenance troop. Go Air Force!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. incompetents. the lot of them. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. Spooky doesn't care what you call it.
It'll kill you anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I thought the C-47 was Spooky and the C-130 was Puff
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. Here's a nice piece on the AC-47
I heard a rumor that the guns would bury themselves in casings- so air men would clear the casings away with grain scoops-might be just a story.

While other aircraft would eventually succeed the C-47, such as the C-119 and C-130 with their larger capacity and features, the C-47 pioneered the development of gunships with the first AC-47 during the Vietnam war. It's Call Sign was "Spooky".

The AC-47 was capable of putting a highly explosive bullet into every square yard of a football field size target in 3 seconds, and it could do this intermittently while loitering over it's same target for hours as long as it had the ammo on board.

It didn't take long for it to earn the nickname "Puff, the Magic Dragon", or "Dragonship". Impressive from a distance, it appeared to roar as never ending blazes of bright red tracer rounds from it's mini guns shot to the ground against a dark background of night.

http://pinkmingos.hubpages.com/hub/The-Douglas-AC-47-Puff-the-Magic-Dragon-Vietnam-Gunship
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I remember well, both of those spewing out the fire power.
You could hear the crackle of the bullets even a click away, and at night it was a truly spectacular display..Imagine taking a red marker and drawing lines in the sky. It was something to behold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. We're both right, sort of.
The Vietnam era AC-47 was known as both "Spooky" and "Puff the Magic Dragon". The new AC-130 comes in both H "Spectre" and U "Spooky" variants, depending on armament. Maybe the planned J model will be named "Puff" again. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_AC-130
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think it's (b) and (c) in your list above...
...Ms. Dozier (or an editor at AP) automatically putting "helicopter" in front of "gunship", without really knowing what an AC-130 actually is, and Army Times just running the AP story without much editing. (Heck, the people at Army Times who actually put it up might not know either. No reason to assume they are soldiers when a cozy contractor can get it done for more (in his pocket).)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammytko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Army times is not published by the Army.
It's a private business catering to army news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. I think Gannet controls all the federal rags, including the military ones. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Let's not forget to add...
...that in addition to the fireworks display (anti-missile flares), it mounts a couple of side-firing 20mm gatling guns (6,000 rounds per minute... each), a 40mm Bofors cannon, and a 105mm howitzer. It circles the target, spraying death in a leisurely fashion, for hours if need be.

it is most definitely a gunship, and most definitely NOT a helicopter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie and algernon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Who ever thought to put an ARTILLERY piece in an aircraft is either demented or brilliant
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Kind of like the concept behind GAU-8 and A-10...


:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. The .50 BMG launches a 700-grain bullet at 2,978 ft/s
For 13,971 foot-pounds of energy

That 30mm launches a 6,560-grain shell at 3,250 ft/s, which I make out to be just shy of 154,000 ft-pounds of energy.

That would, um, HURT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. "Flying artillery"
The piece only weighs 3,000 pounds and the shells are about 15 pounds apiece, so I guess it's just brilliance... assuming the recoil doesn't launch the howitzer across the hold. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Look up WWII
B25, a Mosquito variant, and even a couple of German types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. And one Russian bird
All of them are the predecessors in that role to an uggly bird currently in inventory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Something a bit different--aerial rocket artillery--was used in the Vietnam War
It was an integral part of the Army's two airmobile divisions, the 1st Cav and the 101st Airborne. Rather than putting howitzers on helicopters, the concept involved arming and using helicopter gunships to accomplish fire missions traditionally assigned to tube artillery:

Aerial Rocket Artillery
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_Rocket_Artillery

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. it sure as hell isn't a helicopter.... they've been around a long time.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
13. How is that a helicopter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. See reply #2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. Looks like it's been corrected
Now reads "Records show the aerial response included Apache attack helicopters and an AC-130 gunship."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Spoilsport!
:P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC