Who is Mrs. Sandusky and what does she know?

[tnvoter]

I'm willing to bet Sandusky's wife can fill in a lot of the blanks in this investigation.

[justiceischeap]

1. Wasn't there a restraining order against Mr. Sandusky in place from his own children?

She can't claim not to have any knowledge of this if that is the case.

[pnwmom]

3. When was that? They're all adults now. I think I read the oldest was 40. n/t

[justiceischeap]

6. See #5

It was on behalf of all his grandchildren.

[pnwmom]

8. Okay, grandchildren makes sense. I knew his children were too old. n/t

[pnwmom]

2. She's another victim. I just hope his adopted children are not. n/t

[justiceischeap]

5. See #1

http://pahomepage.com/fulltext?nxd_id=209866

[beac]

9. Her husband abused kids in her home. Her husband abused kids on trips she took with them.

She may not have participated in the abuse, but she turned a blind eye to it. She's no victim. She's an enabler.

[tnvoter]

10. Agree. I think she is complicit

They took in foster kids, I think. She had to have wondered why the heck Sandusky was spending so much time "tucking them in."

And plus, the investigation has been going on for more than a decade. I would think she would have confronted him about the first allegations and even if she beleived him then, she should have gotten a clue by the time the second victim (with eyewitness account from McCreary) was reported and Sandusky was fired.

She KNOWS.

She should be a part of the investigation.

[qanda]

4. Yes. Especially since she tried to contact a victim right before he gave his grand jury testimony

Sick does not even begin to describe how I feel about this whole thing.

[TheWraith]

7. I seriously doubt she'd be willing to fill in said blanks. nt

[Cirque du So-What]

11. In that case, she should be charged separately

She cannot be compelled to testify against her husband, so she should be charged as an accomplice. I am not a lawyer, so my opinion counts for squat, but it seems to be the right thing to do.

[coalition_unwilling]

12. And when did she know it? Chronology is important. - n/t