Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gingrich Admits Deregulation Of Wall Street In The ’90s Was ‘Probably A Mistake’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-11 02:35 PM
Original message
Gingrich Admits Deregulation Of Wall Street In The ’90s Was ‘Probably A Mistake’
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/11/08/364404/gingrich-wall-street-deregulation-mistak/

TAPPER: One question I want to ask has to do with your call to repeal the Wall Street reforms, Dodd-Frank. I don’t think a lot of Americans would understand why anyone would want to repeal regulations that happened after this calamity on Wall Street. If you disagree with those regulations that were imposed, do you agree at least that there should be some new reforms or regulations?

GINGRICH: Sure, there should be very decisive reforms. I think, in retrospect, repealing the Glass-Steagall Act was probably a mistake. We should probably reestablish dividing up the big banks into a banking function and an investment function and separating them out again.

Though he had resigned by the time the final blow was dealt to Glass-Steagall in 1999, Gingrich was instrumental in picking it apart. In fact, the New York Times noted in 1998 that, during a failed attempt to repeal Glass-Steagall, Gingrich “scurried through the afternoon to line up the necessary votes” in favor of repeal.

Reinstating Glass-Steagall would require breaking up the biggest banks, a step much further than Dodd-Frank embraced and something to which the Obama administration was never open (to its detriment). But Gingrich is not the only Republican to advocate such a step; both former Gov. Jon Huntsman (R-UT) and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) have called for a return to Glass-Steagall, as did former Citigroup CEO John Reed, who was instrumental in having the regulation repealed.

````````````````````````````````
Of course, if Obama was for bringing Glass-Steagall back, they would all be against it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-11 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's only saying this now because the message of the OWS
Edited on Wed Nov-09-11 02:38 PM by redqueen
and 99% movement has gone mainstream.

I said before he was an idiot. He's no idiot. He just knows his audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-11 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yuh think, you greedy, corrupt moron?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. And tomorrow he'll say he didn't mean it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. And you're "probably" not a shining example of marital fidelity, Newt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-11 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. I applaud Newt for finally saying something that made sense.
But we all know he would never actually allow Glass-Steagall to be reinstated if he had the power to stop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-11 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. because all the institutions who for years supported repeal
Edited on Wed Nov-09-11 03:13 PM by elleng
will be GONE, DEAD (where they're headed now) and they'll be paying him off? Don't think so, but he was correct to oppose repeal when he did (allegedly).
He's very smart, but his timing is bad, has been for some time.
Bye, newtie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DocMac Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-11 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think the American people are
sick and tired of career politicians. Newt is good with history but spins it.

Seriously, Newt can't win and if he did I can't imagine what he would do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-11 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. A run to the middle? From Newt?!?!
Maybe Cain is in more trouble than we thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-11 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Smart guy, Newt. Nothing gets past him -- after 20 years or so.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Gringrich is as sleazy as he ever was -- and willing to say anything -- one of their
Edited on Wed Nov-09-11 04:04 PM by defendandprotect
best RW propagandists -- !!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-11 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. This hints once again at the faintest trace of principle in the hollow shell of Gingrich...
I presume that it's just another lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC