Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Diaper legislation generates rash of criticism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:03 AM
Original message
Diaper legislation generates rash of criticism
Diaper legislation generates rash of criticism

Proposed federal legislation that would make it easier for child-care providers to use federal funds to provide diapers to low-income families has drawn criticism that the nation is becoming, uh, a nanny state.

The chief sponsor of the Diaper Investment and Aid to Promote Economic Recovery, or DIAPER, Act has portrayed it as a jobs measure -- as just about every bill introduced in Congress seems to be portrayed these days -- saying it would help parents get their children into daycare so the parents can work.

"For families struggling to pay for rent, to have enough gas to get to work, or even to put food on the table, spending an average of $4 a day -- or over $100 a month -- on diapers is beyond their means," Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) said in a letter to House colleagues seeking their support for the bill.

"But without a sufficient supply of diapers, children cannot attend day care. In fact, over one in five mothers have had to skip an obligation and stay home with their child because of lack of diapers. And losing out on day care makes it even harder for parents to put in a full day's work. And so they fall further behind."

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/nationnow/2011/11/diaper-legislation-rosa-delauro-rush-limbaugh.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course, it's RepubliCONS who are putting up a stink about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. cloth diapers - where have you gone?

paper diapers are a hazard to the earth

cloth diapers use water, soap and bleach, but you only buy them once. yes you need a plastic or rubber pants to cover the cloth. which you only buy once.

I think paper diapers are moving global warming along at a faster pace.

however, tree/paper Barons make piles of money off paper diapers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. But you have to have a washer/dryer to do so and how many poor people have them?
They usually have to go to a local laundromat or to a basement coin op washer. Have you ever slogged dirty diapers around? I did, when my kids were babies. It wasn't easy and I was a stay at home mom with my own washer and dryer and that was fine, I was young and strong. I can't imagine people having to do the diapers and work a couple of jobs. Plus, are day care centers going to let you send your baby in cloth diapers to their centers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I hear you - and yes I've done cloth diapers by hand

and yes some childcare places won't do cloth.

global warming will and is trumping all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just what will Vitter do??? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Rather than subsidizing childcare, why not pay a living wage to the parents?
For that matter, why not provide a stipend for stay-at-home parents who sure as hell have to work at least one full-time job simply by caring for their kids.

It's criminal that professional childcare providers barely learn a living wage. It's even worse that circumstances force parents to leave their kids and return to the workforce against their will.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. agree - a baby is 24 hr. job. and that job is mostly ignored


and thought of as a woman's thing. thus less important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC