Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Follow-up questions not asked so far: Let's start with CHEENEE and Goodhair

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 10:29 AM
Original message
Follow-up questions not asked so far: Let's start with CHEENEE and Goodhair
Edited on Tue Nov-01-11 10:45 AM by UTUSN
So Condo RICE was able to parry CHEENEE's "Crying Condo" tale with her "CHEENEE Scared Us" poison tale.

Before getting to the follow-up question, let's pause to meditate on the concept of Everybody's Dark Side: Everybody's got that deep dark place we mostly, without literary license, don't want known even by our closest confidants. Now, what about the dark side of somebody like CHEENEE, whose got a lot of Public dark side?!1 Isn't it likely that he's got a Darker Shade of Dark, deep DEEP *DEEP* down?!1

So, with his lifelong experience in the bowels of bureaucracy, where he knows how everybody occupying public offices will react, mostly within the bounds of protocols, and how he knows that, really, *anything* goes and can be done outside of rules and regulations -- and outside of, pffft!1, THE CONSTITUTION!1 -- if the desire and the will are there, when he shocked his theoretical chain of command by telling them they might have been poisoned -- all of them, ALL of his rivals -- is it really that unthinkable that he might have fleetingly thought that one or more of them might have keeled over just from cardiac arrest or some other chink in their body composition?!1

***********So, the missing piece in Condo's story is, AFTER the tests were negative for poisoning, did *anybody* ask CHEENEE, just to follow up, what exactly were the data and the system that set off his own battery alarm?!1 What was the evidence that triggered his, um, warning? Oh, and why is the Vice President the one who gets crucial information FIRST?!1

And today as an afterthought, if anybody here read his book, did he happen to mention this episode?!1 Why *wouldn't* he, since publishers would be salivating for such little details?!1


*********And now, the follow-up for Goodhair, if any of our crack journalists can even conceive it: Your behavior and speech in the New Hampsire video are so bizarre and in contrast to most of your behavior, it has been suggested by some apologists that you were just being "loose," but others reasonably think you were drunk, or on drugs whether prescribed for back pain or both or some other kind of non-medicinal drug. How do you explain your performance? And do you think somebody with personality swings like that should be making life and death decicions, either now when death penalty reviews cross your desk or potentially as president of a world power?!1 What exactly were you ON, Goodhair?!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. 'nother one for CHEENEE: Could he have, gasp, *made. it. up*?!1
Just saying, this was more of his intel that was WRONG, so if nobody asked him where it came from, would making this up be so far fetched?!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nobody since J. Edgar knew the nefarious uses of bureaucracy like blackmail likeCHEENEE & Darth Rums
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC