|
I think there should be distinctions between drug classifications. Heroin and meth, for instance, are generally much more devastating to lives than pot. I'm not sure where other drugs would fall on that scale, but those are two extremes to make the point. For clarity, I'll say "hard drugs" vs. "pot."
Decriminalize -- I agree, except maybe for distribution of some drugs (which the pharmacy suggestion could solve) and maybe some forms of endangering a minor by introducing them to hard drugs, whether by coercion or even persuasion.
Don't Legalize -- I agree about not legalizing sales of hard drugs. But I don't see any reason not to legalize pot -- something people can grow and enjoy on their own anyway, with no risks to society greater than tobacco, alcohol or firearms for that matter.
Affordable rehab -- I would go as far as FREE rehab. The money saved on courts and jails would cover residential programs, and states already do provide them.
Jail -- Agree there, too, for use and addiction. It's a ridiculous misuse of judicial and penal systems, wastes money, and is largely ineffective to boot! For any acts that remained criminal (as above, i.e. pushing), jail would make some sense.
Allow pharmacies to sell drugs with prescription -- yes, for addicts. "Medical marijuana" shouldn't require a prescription, in my opinion -- there shouldn't be such a thing. Opiates are already available with prescriptions, though.
I think -- I don't know, I just think -- that if The State (the government) really didn't want illegal drugs in this country, they could have done quite a lot that they haven't... to the point that I find it hard to believe that at some point along the way at least, there hasn't been some complicity. This is one of my tinfoil hats. (Who has the hard-drug epidemic benefitted, and who has it harmed; where are poppies grown in massive quantities, for example, and what dealings does the US have there...)
We are SO far from decriminalization, and treating addiction as an illness, that we're now seeing this battle about government drug testing as a qualification for assistance!! So this train is still going backwards.
Because of the limitations of the laws we have now, I support something that may sound awful at first. I believe that heroin addicts, like other mentally ill people, should be able to be restrained or "committed" (or as it is now, arrested and jailed if nothing else, unfortunately), for the same reasons. If it's legal to intervene when people are suicidal, it should be legal to intervene if people are playing Russian roulette with needles. As it is, society says they are "making a choice" and deserve whatever happens to them.
::Removing tinfoil hat and stepping off the soapbox:: :hi:
|