Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards Blames Obama for Indictment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 11:24 AM
Original message
Edwards Blames Obama for Indictment
The defense team for John Edwards said in a court filing that President Obama's Justice Department "lacked the political courage" to stop a Bush-appointed prosecutor from indicting their client on campaign finance-related charges "even though the prosecution's theory is completely unpredecented," Politico reports.

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2011/10/13/edwards_blames_obama_for_indictment.html

I wonder if he thinks he should have endorsed Hillary instead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. ROFL, poor smoove johnny...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Seems like Obama's Justice Department ignores Wall Street
Edited on Thu Oct-13-11 11:27 AM by itsrobert
and goes out of their way to prosecute Democrats/Liberals, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. DOJ is no better now than it was under Bush
One of the problems with Democratic Party administrations is the timidity with which they approach situations where rethug administrations have brazenly done corrupt and/or illegal appointments or policies before democrats take over.

Democrats seem to assume that if they allow the corrupt/illegal acts of rethugs to stay and instead mildly push to brings things to the state they were before the actions were instituted, then things will revert to normal and rethugs will not do same again.

But that has proven to be false assumption and instead encouraged the rethugs to do more. Now the Obama administration not doing anything about the Bush administration's corrupting appointments and other illegal acts in the Justice Department has resulted in tilted actions by the department and when you consider that the rethugs have control of the SC as well, I am inclined to be ever more pessimistic about things over all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. +1 ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
81. +10
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Read today's news.
And criminal action needs to be taken when Democrats break laws, or do want Justice to be a strictly political punishing orginization, like Republicans use it when they are in power?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. ^
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. No one wants criminal activity to be ignored by members of either
party. How do you feel about the Republican War Criminals being given a pass by the same DOJ? How about the political firing of US Attorneys that was ignored? And the Economic Criminals especially after having Sen Levin's Committee refer those crimes to the DOJ?

Frankly, Edwards' 'crimes' pale before those this DOJ has chosen to 'move on' from. If we have to choose, which apparently we do, I would say 'move on from Edwards and go after those major Republican criminals. But it seems to be the other way around. Bush would be doing the very same thing, wouldn't he, so where's the 'change' we all worked so hard to get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Ex-Hedge Fund Boss Sentenced To 11 Years In Prison
A former billionaire described by the government as "the modern face of illegal insider trading" was sentenced Thursday to 11 years in prison, the longest insider trading sentence ever but far short of the two decades sought by prosecutors.

Galleon Group founder Raj Rajaratnam also was fined $10 million by U.S. District Judge Richard J. Holwell, who said he concluded that Rajaratnam made well over $50 million in profits from his illegal trades.

"His crimes and the scope of his crimes reflect a virus in our business culture that needs to be eradicated," Holwell said.

The Sri Lanka-born Rajaratnam, 54, was ordered to report to a yet-to-be-designated prison on Nov. 28.

more: http://www.npr.org/2011/10/13/141311454/u-s-seeks-record-sentence-for-ex-hedge-fund-boss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
65. 11 years....that's nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Do you realize if Kerry would have won in 2004
This POS would probably be our VP right now.

And all this shit would be coming out. The liberal media would pile on and the Dems would never be able to dig out of it.

It still would have been better than 4 years of the boy king but it would not have been great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Did Edwards have an illegitimate baby in 2004, too?
Nope, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Ah, so he cheated on his wife because he didn't get VP?
Nope, sorry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. I didn't say that though, did I?
Edited on Thu Oct-13-11 12:28 PM by Major Hogwash
Edwards had his fucking affair after 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. 2006 to be exact. A little more than a year after his wife was diagnosed with breast cancer.
Edited on Thu Oct-13-11 12:52 PM by JTFrog
A year after Kerry would have been sworn in.

And it would have been just lovely watching the Republicans completely destroy the Democratic party over it.

It seems you are assuming that he wouldn't have cheated on his wife if he was VP. I call bullshit. A cheater is a cheater is a cheater. It would have happened at some point and Dem's would have been raked over the coals for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
64. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #23
84. Pretty cocksure about your imaginary history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. kerry would still have been worth it. fire edwards and pick new VP.
i didnt like how edwards ran with kerry. sat on his ass and not that supportive of kerry. dean was more supportive. lost a lot of respect for edwards in 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
73. Ahem, Kerry did win. He just failed to step forward and
Edited on Thu Oct-13-11 09:39 PM by anamandujano
collect his our prize.

That said, Edwards should realize that whining won't get him the sympathy he craves and as others have suggested STFU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. I have no problem with Edwards cheating. I do have a problem with using campaign $$ to cover up.
Don't get me wrong, I would hate to be a woman married to him, and I have a great deal of sympathy for Elizabeth (RIP)

But cheating is not indicative of how an elected official will govern.

Stealing money, on the other hand, is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. How about breaking promises to the person who trusted him the most.
It's not the sex, it's the deceit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. He's a politician. Politicians lie.
Yes, he was a horrible husband. So was John F Kennedy. Kennedy was a decent president, tho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. What makes you think you know so much about the details of their relationship?
DO you have inside data to share? Links?

Most marriages cheat. Most marriages are okay with it in the long run. Most people are hypocritical about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Cheating on his cancer-stricken wife was particularly nauseating (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. WTF?
Most marriages cheat? Most marriages are okay with it in the long run? Most people are hypocritical about it?

Do you have inside data to share? Links?

Nothing like scolding someone with statements pulled out of one's ass.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
51. She wrote a book.
Look into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liquorice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
57. Most marriages don't cheat. LOL Marriages are quite faithful, I'll have you know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. For a trial attorney, Johnny suddenly doesn't seem to have much faith in juries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
47. Indeed, I caught that irony....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. boy, was I wrong about that guy.
At least I can admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. You and me both, brother.
We dodged a huge bullet with Smoove Joohnny.

Bullshit artist lawyer is all he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
69. Just call him "bullshit artist" and leave it at that. "Lawyer" isn't a bad thing.
Obama's a lawyer. And so are a lot of Democrats in government.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Me three. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
50. Same here
now he makes me :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
58. Same here. Hard to say who's the bigger jerk--him or me.
Umm...him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. I don't know you
but, really, my gut instinct is that the answer is him. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #59
87. Thank you!
:)


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. fuck edwards. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
79. Ms. Hunter put a check next to that item on her "To Do" List. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Township75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. And so a non-Bush appointed prosecutor would have looked at this and said everything is ok??
John Edwards is a piece of shit, regardless of who appointed the prosecutor. I bet he is just hoping to get some support from anyone who has a knee jerk reaction upon hearing the name "Bush".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. I agree
Fuck the DOJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
26. Hey John, you ambulance chasing weasel.
Didn't you endorse Obama in 2008? Serves you right.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. no words.
except typical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Ditto for you, my friend.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. skirt chasing lieing weasel vs. ambulance chasing lieing weasel.
I wouldn't be proud of either of these assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Who are you talking about?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. are you talking about Clinton ? because Clinton didn't claim to be some great moral guy like Edwards
did. and Edwards went after Clinton for his cheating .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #28
56. I'm NOTdisillusioned with Johney whose father was a millworker. He lived up to my expectations!
Never liked him and never trusted him. Always thought he was for poor America for purely political reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Neverending bitter.
Poor thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. Can't a girl have her fun?
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #37
83. now Bea, behave! i'll bribe you!


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #83
85. Another new banky!!!
And this one is posing by a window, so cute!!!

Thank you, my friend.

:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #85
86. on a cold fall day, a banky can be worth it's weight in gold...
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #86
88. Yes, it can.
Thank you. I hope that all is well with you.

:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
27. Edwards should STFU n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
31. Send him to Dr. Phil for a good talking to about responsibility.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #31
48. "How's that using campaign money to cover up your love-child workin' out fer ya?" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
34. Hillary is part of Koch funded DLC leadership --
Obama is a "New Dem" and Dem Party is now controlled by the Third Way!

But think they're trying to take Edwards' law license -- ????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbral Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
36. I still prefer him to the guy that won...
Whether he meant it or not, at least he knew what to say - better than hiding behind weasel words and outright lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. .
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. ..
:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. Yeah, because Edwards would never lie or use weasel words.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #36
61. That statement is pure evidence for the existence of ODS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #36
63. Weasel Words & Outright Lies 'R Me.
Edwards newest business endeavour corporate name.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
44. Edwards needs to understand..in America, sex is bad, but killing and thievery are a-ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. He's not being indicted for the sex. He's being indicted for the STEALING. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #45
77. Stealing what? wtf are you even babbling about, "dear"?
Edited on Thu Oct-13-11 10:14 PM by inna

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #77
80. Using campaign funds for hush money. Sounds like stealing
to me.

And what's with the "dear" thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Except if you're a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
49. Gee Johnny I guess you wasted that endorsement ..
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morningglory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
52. I blame JE for diddling around on the money I sent him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
53. This is a court case, folks. Not a morality play.
Whatever else is true about Edwards, the guy will fight in court like there's no tomorrow.

He's in it to win and he'll do everything to win.

He's throwing everything in. He's always done this.

The guy was a total sleaze in his personal life,

but I've always liked a fighter.

I also think that the government will have trouble proving up its case here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
54. Blame everyone but yourself, Johnny...
Just what we'd expect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
55. How 'bout John Edwards "lacking the moral courage" to keep his pants zipped and his eyes
off the conniving camera bimbo while he was STILL MARRIED - and not just to any woman but to the mother of his children who was struggling against terminal cancer??????

Man - and to think I used to believe in this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
60. It couldn't be because you are a smarmy lying sack of shit, could it, John??
Edited on Thu Oct-13-11 06:36 PM by YellowRubberDuckie
Once he cheated on Elizabeth, it was over for him. He should just plead guilty and go to Prison. He's a douche and guilty as hell.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
62. why not. even the egg salad gone bad in my fridge is somehow Obama's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
66. Edwards is pretty much right here
First, a little history about this particular federal attorney. He got his job due to Jesse Helms, and is currently running for Congress in a seat drawn just for him. He has prosecuted only Democrats for public corruption during his years in office.

Second, this is literally the first time such a prosecution has ever been attempted. The case entirely depends on the state of mind of the two donors, one of whom is dead, and the other of whom is nearly 100. If they gave him the money because they liked him and wanted to help him out of a jam as opposed to wanting to get him elected then the contributions are not campaign contributions. Fine the man and call it a day. The simple fact is, it is all but impossible to think he can get a fair trial. He is a shitty husband, but he shouldn't be jailed for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Empowerer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. You're right
Edited on Thu Oct-13-11 09:42 PM by Empowerer
And the prosecutor is the former law clerk of the judge that John Edwards kept from being confirmed to a lifetime appointment to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals because of his abysmal record on civil rights. Edwards put a considerable amount of his political capital on the line and went up against some big interests in North Carolina to do so.

And now it's payback time for Boyle and his supporters, including his protege, the U.S. Attorney. Whatever anyone thinks about John Edwards' behavior, this case is purely political revenge and should never have been brought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. exactly. thank you; refreshing in an otherwise (mostly) dismal thread of responses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Empowerer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #70
74. It is sad to see how nasty, hateful and vindictive people can be, isn't it?
Edited on Thu Oct-13-11 09:49 PM by Empowerer
The man made a terrible mistake and is paying for it. He destroyed his life, career and reputation. The wife he betrayed has died. He has young children to raise. I get no pleasure out of his circumstances. I can certainly understand people's disappointment in and anger with him. Apparently, I'm in the minority. But the comments about him go beyond that. They're just mean-spirited and nasty.

It must be nice to be so perfect in our own lives that we can sneer at, mock and enjoy the pain of everyone else who isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liskddksil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Thank you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. in full agreement - except for the last sentence, obviously. :)
and thanks again! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #74
89. agree totally...pretty nasty stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drahthaardogs Donating Member (482 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
67. John,
It was your high-maintenance mistress and your misappropriation of funds that got you indicted. Obama had nothing to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
71. Obama sold out Seigelman for a promise of GOP support of Health Care Reform.
I can easily believe that he sold out Edwards, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. John only has John to blame for his reckless and disgusting behavior. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #72
82. NO!11!1 IT HAS TO BE MEAN 'OL OBAMA'S FAULT11!1!!1!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
78. STFU, John Edwards. You have made yourself irrelevant and ruined
a populist theme you started in 2004.

Douchebag.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC