Mr. President: Despite fantasy media projections -- imagining you the reincarnated Harry Truman -- stubborn, historical reality intervenes. Balderdash. Viewed simply as one strong leader commanding your own fate, you're far short of JFK, LBJ, or Bill Clinton. If similar to any modern Democrat, it's misguided, beleagued Jimmy Carter -- whose high rhetoric was likewise crushed when power politics unearthed rank inexperience.
But the second coming of pugnacious, risk-taking, courageous Truman? Dream on. Neither in style or substance do you approximate give-'em-hell Harry -- not how you barely assail foes, nor fail to defend majority interest; not by taking risks and certainly not by getting your way. Frankly, Barry, you're not giving anyone hell, certainly not the fringe -- only indigestion to distraught leftwingers sniffing for alternatives. And no violins, please, about onerous political inheritances. Was yours worse than taking over for the legendary FDR, ending a world war, rebuilding the western world, confronting nuclear arms, communist blockades and the Cold War, or battling domestic economic upheavals plus headstrong rightwingers?
No way. Awash with monumental threats, Truman refused to cave, nor stagger from dread of defeat. He took chances, even risked what you value over all -- re-election. Truman pushed a bold, costly Marshall Plan against high resistance, proposed a (failed) universal health plan than shames Obamacare, challenged economic royalists, and desegregated the military -- offending racists everywhere, especially Dixie Democrats.
Like Carter, you obliterated your own vital narratives, estranged Main Street by not rocking entrenched boats -- even today still brandishing the absurd notion that bury-the-difference bipartisanship works. You can't even leverage the bully pulpit against truly sadistic bullies, despite the Grand Canyon-sized openings they leave. Let's see, 1) Repugs willingly sacrifice America to defeat a "foreign" president, 2) offer zero jobs programs (except LESS taxes, rights and deregulation) and 3) whose bizarre answer to Wall Street "booboos," Gulf oil "leaks," or mining "accidents" is MORE glorified free-market chaos. That's a guarantee for universal fairness and safety, plus health and pension programs!
4. I think that it is interesting that HH did a really great job when he
administered the aid program for the victims of WWI but lost all that empathy when it came to the American people. I am thinking that he was one who always took the easy way out - don't rock the political boat.
With Obama I am not sure what he is doing. He cannot be so deaf that he does not hear our anger. He knows he is betraying his base. What the hell is he trying to do - get unelected?
3. I think the problem was too many Democrats deluded themselves into thinking he was running as FDR 2
He never really ran as a left winger in the campaign, and I kind of realized that early on when it came to the topic of free trade and health insurance reform and his very glaring silence on the Employee Free-Choice Act.
He only got my vote because I didn't want Hundred Years' War McCain in the White House. Him not being as overtly bad as McCain was the only redeemable reason to vote for Barack Obama.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.