Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader: College athletics dumbing down society

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:27 AM
Original message
Nader: College athletics dumbing down society
http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_19040362

OWS is trying to raise awareness of a smorgasbord of economic issues, and he's talking about college athletic programs and blaming them for widespread societal problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YellowCosmicSun Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe Nader thinks there is no difference between OWS and the Tea Party?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. So the bread and circuses should continue?
Apparently there's not enough college football and junk food, because some people can still think after they graduate. They may not have a job, but they can still think and figure out that they are getting screwed and they better go occupy someplace.

Maybe if colleges went back to teaching, instead of being farm teams for the NBA and the NFL, students could figure out what the future holds for them BEFORE they graduate in a mountain of debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. So how is it you're going to prove to us that you engage in no recreation
over the course of, say, a week? I think we're going to have to see that in order to know that you are not showing some hypocrisy here in criticizing others for being engaged by bread and circuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. College athletics have been around for decades.
No different now than in the 50s. If you're blaming Wall Street greed on college football/basketball, you're dumber than I think you are. There are FAR more serious problems in this effed-up country.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dembotoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. athletic scholarships get some kids who normally would not go to college into college
some are bright,
some are not

it is also a way to bring money into a university
which with tea baggers a foot is a good thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. yeah...that HUGE percentage of college athletes is
dragging down society. sounds like Nader has taken a few hits to the head himself...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. He talked about athletic programs because he was speaking to a class which focuses
on college athletics. Did you not read your own linked article?

"Nader's remarks were at a public event associated with a UC Berkeley class on how an athletics program affects a university. The course is co-taught by Nader's sister, UC Berkeley anthropology professor Laura Nader."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. no, i did not read the article. thank you for the point out. tis significant. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. with some thought though, hardly the dumbing down of society. they blame women courses and
feminism for all that has gone wrong in the industrialize nations....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. The dumbing down quote comes from the title of the article. Not from Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. lol
then maybe i ought to shut up and read the article, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. what, and pass on an opportunity to engage in more nader hating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Seems at some universities...
all the money goes to new stadiums, new training facilities, multi-million-dollar salaries for coaches, nothing but sports, sports, sports.

Meanwhile, the academics departments are all eating budget cuts, having to let people go, can't get enough grants to do enough good research, and are always begging and scraping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Strong athletic programs are often financially self-sufficient
They do not take money away from academic programs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Not so with the UC system and there is a fair amount of activism rising to separate
the UC athletic departments in order to force them to become self-sustaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. They should be giving money to academic programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
28. Only they they ARE strong, and field winning team - which is the reason why coaches
at Universities are better paid than Nobel Prize winners.

Losing teams, and failing programs are a massive drain on University resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
36. That's what they try to tell us about our high school athletics department. It's ALWAYS ...
"the boosters paid for it" but as soon as a levy is being threatened the very first thing out of their mouths is we'll lose our football team or whatever. I'm sick of paying for something very few use outside of high school. How about teaching them to balance a check book, sew a button, cook a meal anything they just might find useful in their adult life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
51. Yes, but for every strong program, how many weak programs are there?
Sure, football brings in a lot for SEC schools and the like. But what about all the other schools where the administrators choose lackluster and unprofitable sports programs over academics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. Only 14 ADs claim profits. Football, and occasionally men's basketball, make money
But the AD's spend it all and more on the huge array of financially losing sports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
44. 22 for 2009-2010
http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2011/06/22_college_football_programs_m.html

but this article does give credence to the fact that loads of school lose money on these programs.

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I am out of date obviously, thanks - but 22 out of 1250+ NCAA schools is still a tiny ratio. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. What impact does Title IX have on it?
I worked in the accounting department of a major university (one of the 22). The football team made ass tons of money, but most of it was soaked up by the women's sports. I am not saying that as a bad thing. However, it was/is a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Not an expert, but certainly a part.
The solution though should not be to shut out women from sports and scholarships, but it probably should be to limit the expenses of non-profitable sports both for men and women.

In all organizations the ones who generate returns get the bigger paychesks and budgets. Companies don't give accountants the same expense budgets as salespeople, and the R&D department at, say, Pfizer, gets a lot more capital investment than the QA department, even though the latter is if anything more important to operations. Why can't colleges limit the travel range of the swim team that generates no profit - even making it an intramural sport if necessary? Why does the women's basketball coach make half as much as the men's while producing one eighth the revenue? Bear in mind it's not the gender of the coach that should drive pay, but the revenue their team generates probably should have some effect. Same for travel, facilities, and other major expenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. really? college athletics... who would have thought. oh, the brilliant nader.
truly rolling eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. I don't know about dumbing down society in its entirety...
...but certainly shifting the focus at universities away from where it should be - namely education. I never could understand how sports became a bigger deal than learning at college. I always thought there was something very wrong with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
14. I agree with Ralph.
Usually, the only reason many students who are in college who play sports are only there to play sports. They don't give a damn about their degree or their classes. If they can throw a ball or catch one or can jump really high, they'll get a free ride to school while others who want to be there have to struggle to pay. The degrees many professional athletes have are a waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
49. So do I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
16. poor nader....he`s reduced to bitch`n about college sports
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. He was speaking at an event organized specific to that issue.
"Nader's remarks were at a public event associated with a UC Berkeley class on how an athletics program affects a university. The course is co-taught by Nader's sister, UC Berkeley anthropology professor Laura Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
20. Unrec for disingenuous OP.
Edited on Wed Oct-05-11 11:00 AM by Rex
If you actually read, you would know he was there to talk about that specific topic. Not that it matters to a hater...just an important fact you don't care about. :eyes:

I love the fact Nader makes people like you hate his guts...he must be doing something right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the other one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
21. Your unhealthy obsession continues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackDragna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. You know, it IS possible to discuss multiple issues at once.
Once again, you drag out an old, conservative attack tactic: "Oh my god! How dare you discuss X when Y is occurring?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
24. Some excerpts from the article since LoZ can't be bothered:
Edited on Wed Oct-05-11 11:06 AM by City Lights
<snip>

Society's attention to athletics, Nader said, has moved people down what he called the "sensuality ladder," a theoretical scale of people's interactions with the world. Nader compared athletics to fast food, which "turns the tongue against the brain."

"Your education is supposed to push you up the sensuality ladder," he said.

Society's path down the ladder is reflected in the fact that universities pay football coaches more than professors and that UC Berkeley alumni were more concerned about the elimination of the baseball team than the university's role designing nuclear weapons, he said.

<snip>

Nader's attention strayed occasionally from athletics to other higher-education subjects. He questioned, for example, why the UC Berkeley law school employed "a war criminal," saying professor John Yoo's role in crafting President George W. Bush's torture policies should not be tolerated.

He also told students they should design a statewide referendum to help slow continually rising tuition. And, he said, college students no longer develop the "civic skills" needed to be leaders.

"That's the skill that determines whether you're going to make a difference in a democratic society," Nader said, "or whether you're going to atrophy your mind in a cul-de-sac."


As always, an unrec for you, LoZ. :thumbsdown:

edited to remove bolding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanSocDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
46. Not to forget....

"Society's path down the ladder is reflected in the fact that universities pay football coaches more than professors and that UC Berkeley alumni were more concerned about the elimination of the baseball team than the university's role designing nuclear weapons, he said."

.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
25. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
26. I heard that DeFranco sports commentator guy on NPR deliver
a similar argument this morning but more in the vein of the economic success of university football teams forces kids from poorer homes to support other less viable sports such as lacrosse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
29. Alas, poor Ralph, we hardly knew ye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
30. even a blind pig finds an acorn once n a while.....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
31. Are we leaving the fact that's he's right to the side for the moment? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
33. This is relevant.
Sports have been given much undue priority and respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
34. there are some programs that make LOADS of bucks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
37. Commentary: Ralph Nader wants to save us all from college football
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Your obesession is up a notch this morning, eh, LoZ?
One Nader thread didn't do it for you today...you needed a double dose!

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. omigoshthatsjustoutrageous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Ralph Nader is not ready for some football. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. Good, Ralph......you work on that....
And stay the fuck out of presidential politics, asshole!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SomethingFishy Donating Member (552 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
50. Hmmm...
You said this:

"OWS is trying to raise awareness of a smorgasbord of economic issues, and he's talking about college athletic programs and blaming them for widespread societal problems."


I would venture that someone could say this:

"OWS is trying to raise awareness of a smorgasbord of economic issues, and he's talking about Ralph Nader talking about college athletic programs and blaming them for widespread societal problems."

Seems like you are condemning Nader for talking about something that you are talking about him talking about. KInda... odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
52. Nader was a college athelete who knew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC