Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court Justice Scalia claims religion trumps law.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
one_voice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 07:32 PM
Original message
Supreme Court Justice Scalia claims religion trumps law.
In America, the Supreme Court is the ultimate judge. Once it has decided a matter, that's pretty much it. Antonin Scalia, one of the judges who sits on that court, has said -- in as many words -- that he only respects the rule of law insofar as it does not conflict with his religious beliefs. For that, nothing short of impeachment is suitable.

*snip*

This isn't the first time Scalia has proven his unworthiness. In 2003, he had to recuse himself from a case involving "Under God." You see, he claimed in a speech that the Framers of the Constitution didn’t intend to “exclude God from the public forums and from political life.” Clearly, unequivocally, undeniably, Scalia is biased beyond mere partisan leaning. He is a danger to the ideals of the framers, and an insult to the blood, sweat, and tears that went into creating America - a place where religious freedom was guaranteed by the dogged refusal of government to endorse or favor any religion. He is a votary of metaphysical woo, not a champion for fairness, equality, and justice.

Antonin Scalia has spit on the Constitution. He has told us very clearly that he is not qualified to preside over a court whose sacrosanct duty is to uphold the law. He is a Christian first and an American second. He is a traitor to his position, and a traitor to the American people.

http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-atlanta/supreme-court-justice-scalia-claims-religion-trumps-law

“The Rule of Law is second only to the Rule of Love. The here and now is less important than the hereafter.” -- Antonin Scalia, Supreme Court Justice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, Vafanculo, Scalia.
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 07:52 PM by DinahMoeHum
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leftist Agitator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. "Culo" has one "L".
But I totally agree with your sentiment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Corrected, thanks.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. hey hey ho ho, antonin scalia has got to go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Scalia's insanity seems to be increasing with age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Let's take donations. Sausage, egg and cheese biscuits aplenty for Fat Tony. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kinda like a Christian version of Sharia Law?
I thought we were against that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bengalherder Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. He is a cultie.
Opus Dei is every bit as dangerous as scientology or Moonies, perhaps more because it can hide under the cover of catholocism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. He's in the wrong country. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whats_Happening Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Scalia has a lot of issues, but I think this snippet you posted is way overblown --
It says he recused himself from that 2003 case.

That quote from him, “The Rule of Law is second only to the Rule of Love. The here and now is less important than the hereafter." seems to me entirely unobjectionable.

The piece you cite seems to imply that only atheists are qualified to be judges. There is no requirement that any judge must believe that man-made laws are the ne plus ultra of justice and righteousness.

(I'm not a Christian; at most, I suspect the Theravada Buddhists may be on to something.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. Impeachment? You're funny. Now look at reality.
Impeachment requires a majority vote in the House. The GOP has control of the House. No bill of impeachment will get past committee.

Conviction requires a 2/3 majority in the Senate. GOP has almost half of the Senate. Conviction won't happen.

Further, it is NOT a crime to have religious convictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC