Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pat Robertson: People with Alzheimers are already dead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:34 PM
Original message
Pat Robertson: People with Alzheimers are already dead
On the same "700 Club" program today in which Pat Robertson (And on the heels of the Tea Party cheering letting uninsured people die) said that Jews must convert to Christianity in order to enter Heaven, he also took on a question from a woman who was friends with a man whose wife is suffering from Alzheimer's Disease and has begun to date another woman and wanted to know what to do.

Robertson's advice was to encourage the husband to divorce his wife with Alzheimer's because she was, for all intents and purposes, already dead. Co-host Terry Meeuwsen understandably wondered if that would not violate the "til death do you part" provision of the wedding vow, which Robertson just pretty much dismissed, saying "he certainly wouldn't put a guilt trip" on anyone who decided that divorce was the answer.

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/robertsons-marital-advice-divorce-your-wife-alzheimers

This, BTW, is the same Pat Robertson who said that Michael Schiavo may have murdered his wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why is Pat Robertson still alive?
He's just a mean old fart who is a waste of oxygen.

If there was a God, I would bet he doesn't want Robertson in the afterlife any more than we want him on earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. According to him, he's not. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #31
43. first two posts, awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #31
47. YOU WIN!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
49. Totally wish I could rec this reply!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. Only the good die young.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. self delete
Edited on Tue Sep-13-11 03:37 PM by demosincebirth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. But Terri Schiavo was alive and kicking, right Pat? God, I despise these people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. He based that on her ability to eat & swallow. So can Alzheimer's patients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm sure the Reagan family appreciates the sentiment.
Or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
38. Once again, my friend, right on the button and cutting to the bone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broderick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. What a turd
hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. I hear the Grim Reaper is a big fan of the GOP now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. While I disagree with the religious gymnastics he went through to get to his answer, I do
agree that there are times when a spouse may want a divorce from their loved one with Alzheimer's, and that they shouldn't be guilt-tripped over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yes, but
you are not demonstrating blatant hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Well there is that, true. He's a hypocrite of the highest order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
57. ou're right. No one should be guilted for dumping their long term partners
when they're no longer useful to them. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Genealogist Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Pat has certainly gone around the bend himself
Even that chirpy talking head he always has with him was questioning this reply. Divorce her because is is pretty much dead anyway? And it is gay folks who are destroying marriage. If there is a time when a marriage is tested, it is when a spouse is ill like that. The sick spouse needs his or her mate more than ever. And this nutcase's response is to divorce her and start anew. Pat is, himself, ill, me thinks. He has always been wacky, and said crazy things, but this is just...bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Amen! That response was promoting a selfish action on the part of the spouse.
Did he forget the "in sickness and in health" bit in the marriage vows?

I cared for my spouse who was suffering from ALS and it was a privilege to do so. No wonder these people can walk away from people in need.

That really burns me! Pat is the one who is pretty much dead. Jerk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. So Nancy Reagan was just a fool and not a devoted wife.
Edited on Tue Sep-13-11 02:42 PM by undeterred
Maybe Pat has a lot to learn about love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Genealogist Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I'll have to say I admire Nancy Reagan's devotion to her husband.
Ten years of caring for the man, sticking with him as she did, til the end. And then her support for the right causes that flew in the face of her party's stance. Took courage. Pat has no courage, no honor, no heart. Never did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. That's real love. Plus her fight for stem cell research.
She's the real deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
48. Do you think nancy actually did the hands-on, day-to-day caring for that man?
I doubt it.


Tikki
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. I'll bet she did some of it.
Edited on Tue Sep-13-11 09:04 PM by undeterred
She certainly did not stuff him away in a nursing home where she never had to be bothered by the thought of him or his presence. And she remained married to him till the day he died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. I bet she did very little, if any, of it....


Tikki
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. What axe are you trying to grind here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
45. Robertson would probably not say that to a woman
whose husband suffers from Alzheimer's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. WTF?
This seems like the most UNCHRISTIAN things imaginable.

How I detest the venomous snake-oil salesmen of organized religion.

If Pat's "Christian" followers actually bought this bullshit, they are lemmings who have already leapt off the cliff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
41. What do you expect?
Pat Robertson isn't a Minister, he's a Lawyer. That's the kind of reasoning he drills into his Law Students.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ironically most of us think Pat Robertson is brain dead
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. Really, Pat Robertson gets to rewrite the true word of God? Matt. 19:9 seems to disagree.
Jesus said, "And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery," (Matt. 19:9).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
55. Matt. 19:9 is so yesterday. Pat speaks directly to God after after a couple of snorts of his special
"medicine".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. it's ok to take their money too
it's in the Bible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. wow! that`s really sick
i`m sure there are more than a few in his flock that are upset about those remarks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
50. I doubt it. They are, after all, members of Pat Robertson's flock.
Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. I don't think his advice is that bad, but his reasoning about why to do it is lousy..
I guess the crux of the issue here is what does a couple do when one member of the couple is unable to reciprocate their end of the marital relationship and extramarital relationships are forbidden. We've had threads here at DU before where people have debated weather someone having sex with his "no longer of sound mind" wife one last time in a nursing home constituted rape. I'd much rather see such a situation resolved by marrying again. Of course, in an ideal world people would simply be able to wait out the expiration of the sick member of the couple, but the increased quality of care is making prolonged period of morbidity more of a norm. I think the key here has to be amicability. As long as the divorce would not cause distress to the sick member of the couple, would not result in a worsening of care, and would not involve the the healthy party renouncing their obligation to tend to the sick, then I would approve of that course of action. In fact, I could even support not getting a divorce and merely entering a second marriage in such a situation.

Robertson's reasoning is faulty. The grounds for this is abandonment on the part of the spouse who is unable to reciprocate the nurturing relationship between the couple. This is abandonment without malice, but the effect is the same. They are sadly no longer capable of participating in a marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. There is much more to marriage than sex.
When a spouse is in need, how could anyone walk away?

I am livid over the comments by Robertson. He needs to disappear. No wonder some of his followers are so screwed up. He is a slimy snake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. True, there are also things like emotional support, which spouses of sufferers of Alzheimer's...
also eventually have to do without. I'm not saying that the sick people are bad, cruel, or mean. I'm just saying that just because you want a new spouse doesn't make you bad, cruel, or mean either. It also doesn't mean that you're walking away from the first person. You can provide what they need without being married to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. Pat Robertson is already dead then, since he obviously has no heart or soul.
So sayeth Arbusto Baboso, which has as much force as any "scripture".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. "In sickness and in health"
Weren't you paying attention when you made that vow, Pat? You were up in front of God and everybody. Or did your wedding vows begin and end with your bride talking about obeying you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
53. That's really the bottom line here
I think some people when they get married and take that vow don't stop to consider that either of them might get old or sick.

I guess it's hard to imagine when you're young and healthy and full of vitality. And that's sad. I always have to roll my eyes a bit when people say they're getting married because "we're so much in love".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. Note to Pat's wife: Keep your wits about you!!!! na
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. T-4 Pat? I am sure he'd love to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. Those who are willfully ignorant might as well be dead.



Over the years I have gotten to the point where nothing
Pat Robertson says or does surprises me any more.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. If Pat goes to heaven my goldfish will...
Poontang Pat is just saying what he'd do out loud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
astonamous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. so Pat what would you liike us to do with your body?
You have obviously lost your damned mind years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
28. So, Pat becomes his own Death Panel?
He gets to decide the rules all by himself....


How F - ing charming.....:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
29. Then he must be in favor of euthenasia for those with Alzheimers.
Even those who have lucid moments. Who'd have thunk it? Well, actually, any of us might have predicted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
30. Decades ago I worked with Alzheimer's patients and, while I don't agree
with much of what he said, it was pretty clear to me that the spark had gone out in the poor people at the end stages of the disease. You'll never forget it once you see it. In many ways they are dead. And sometimes it's so horrible you wish they would go to sleep and never wake up. (It kills me to be within any kind of striking distance in agreeing with Rev. Nutjob.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Cancer patients can also lose their "spark" but imagine the criticism if you
divorced your spouse in that circumstance. No different.

`Til death do us part means exactly that. Robertson knows that or should get out of the business if he doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. I agree. Maybe "spark" was not the right word. There is no right word.
I remember 2 ladies in particular who recognized no one or nothing and wandered the hallways mumbling jibberish. They had no control of their bodily functions, couldn't feed themselves - didn't recognize food, and when people came to vist it was the most heartbreaking thing you can imagine. I guess it's like being dead alive. I know if I was ever diagnosed with Alzheimer's there would come a point when I would commit suicide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. I think this is particularly interesting because of the stunning hypocrisy of the Schiavo debacle
This is the same guy who said that removing Terri Schiavo's feeding tube was 'judicial murder' and was also cooking up conspiracy theories and saying that her husband might have did something to Terri to put her in the state she was in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
39. Once again, Pat, how "Christian" of you!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
40. How sick and disrespectful is that
People that I know whose mate is in care because of dementia and alzheimers, if they start a relationship with another person they don't divorce the sick spouse. They continue to visit and care for them, sometimes even the new person visits and becomes a caregiver too. I would never begrudge my stepmother a new relationship, Dad has been in care for years now and I know she is lonely. I also know that she would never abandon or divorce him because she loves him. He certainly isn't dead to any of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
44. For all intents and purposes, he can go choke on a hubbard squash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
46. Wait! I thought marriage was so sacred that letting gays marry would defile it.
Apparently it's NOT so sacred that the vows (taken before god and everybody) that commit you to your marriage "in sickness and in health" and "'til death do us part" can't be broken when they become inconvenient.

Feh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
56. What a piece of work this guy is....
I hope all this HATE SPEECH he gives out as advice comes back to smack him into next week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC