Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Shared sacrifice?" Not for everyone.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-11 09:39 AM
Original message
"Shared sacrifice?" Not for everyone.
The Education Achievement Authority last Friday named John Covington chancellor of a new statewide district composed of the lowest 5 percent of Michigan schools, many of which are located in Detroit. The Free Press today reported on his hiring but said nothing of the circumstances of his departure from Kansas City.

Covington leaves a legacy of disarray; he spent just two years at the helm of Kansas Citys schools, and after he bolted in the second week of classes as the district awaits an accreditation decision from the state, Michiganders should wonder how long he will really remain here. In Kansas City, he presided over an era of mass teacher-replacement, financial restructuring, and dismal test scores that he called a low water mark for the district. This stands in stark contrast to his record of achievement Gov. Snyder and the state board have lauded.

As a reward for coming to Michigan, Covington will receive a salary of $225,000 in the first year, with a $175,000 signing bonus. His base salary will increase to $325,000 in his second year on the job, and if he meets goals that have not yet been determined, hell make more than $425,000 in each of the next two years. His contract is effective Thursday, but it is unknown when hell actually start, since his resignation in Kansas City is not effective until September 23.

When the state House passed its education budget, Rep. Bill Rogers (R-Brighton) claimed there is no correlation between the amount of money that we spend and student achievement. If this is true, then why is it necessary for taxpayers to spend an extra $1.5 million over four years, including an $800/month car allowance, on bringing to Michigan an administrator who has produced questionable results in other districts? Gov. Snyder talks about finding innovative solutions to our states problems and implementing value for money government, but it is unclear how these innovative solutions require spending seven figures on one administrator.

http://www.progressmichigan.org/blog/2011/08/shared-sac...

and from KC:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theaocp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-11 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. You have to go along to get along.
It's almost like the amount of money someone makes (after a certain amount) is directly proportional to how much value they have to society. This guy is here to get rich and get rich quick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep 18th 2014, 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC