Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Us or the War Machine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:55 AM
Original message
Us or the War Machine
An upcoming Charlottesville conference highlights the importance of whistleblowers when addressing the corruption present in military contracting
By David Swanson, Guest Viewpoint on August 31, 2011, Cavalier Daily
http://www.cavalierdaily.com/2011/08/31/us-or-the-war-m...

YOU MAY have heard something about a budget crisis in Washington this summer. Were you aware that in the midst of it the House of Representatives passed a military spending bill larger than ever before?

U.S. military spending across numerous departments has increased dramatically during the past decade and now makes up about half of federal discretionary spending. Yet the Defense Department has not been fully audited in 20 years, and as of 2001 it could not account for $2.3 trillion out of the $10 trillion or so it had been given during that time. More recently, President Obama has been waging his days, not weeks war in Libya for months without a dime appropriated by Congress, relying instead on the loose change lying around at the Pentagon.

The United States could reduce its military spending by at least 80 percent and still be the worlds top military spender. If the purpose of all this profligacy were truly defensive, wouldnt a military merely as large as any other countrys do the job? When little cuts around the edges were forced into the discussion, wouldnt the top priorities for elimination be unpopular wars, foreign bases, nuclear weapons and space weapons rather than health care for veterans? If something shameful were not motivating our self-destructive imperial overreach, wouldnt the wonders of market competition be given a chance, instead of the current practice of handing out cost-plus contracts to cronies for jobs they are never expected to complete?

Paying our debts
When someone inside the military contracting process gives us a peak at what is done with half our income taxes, we owe that person a debt of gratitude. And the person who has opened the widest crack in the wall of secrecy around Pentagon spending in recent years is probably Bunnatine Bunny Greenhouse, who will be speaking in Charlottesville along with more than 20 other experts Sept. 16-18.

In February 2003, just before the United States invaded Iraq, Greenhouse, the chief contracting officer for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, found herself in a Pentagon meeting discussing the terms of an Iraq contract to be awarded to Halliburton, the company for which then-Vice President Dick Cheney had served previously as CEO. Greenhouse whispered to the general running the meeting that she objected to the presence of several Halliburton representatives in the room, and when they had left she recommended against awarding the company a $7 billion emergency, no-bid contract for five years. While it was ludicrous to pretend that a contracting emergency would last that long, Congress has continued ever since to fund our wars with off-the-books emergency supplemental bills.

Despite Cheneys claim to the contrary on NBCs Meet the Press on Sept. 14, 2003, he had been involved in creating that Halliburton contract. This is shown by an email that Time Magazine published in June 2004, as well as by the testimony of political appointee Michael Mobbs. Mobbs had worked with Halliburton to create the need for the contract and then to fill it, much as then Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney had, years earlier, created needs for Halliburtons services that he had then been able to fill as its CEO.

Cheney hired Halliburton to recommend privatizing military services with a company like Halliburton. Halliburton, in turn, hired Cheney to share in the spoils. And then Cheney, while still receiving deferred compensation from Halliburton, made sure his company continued to rake in the profits. This chutzpah was matched only by the Halliburton drivers hauling empty trucks across Iraq and reporting that they had transported sailboat fuel.

Greenhouses resistance to the corrupt cronyism that predated and outlasted Cheney cost her the job of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers chief contracting officer. This summer she finally was awarded $970,000 in restitution. If that award legitimizes Greenhouses concerns in the eyes of many, so much the better. We really should not need a stamp of approval from our government, however, before approving of serious criticism of governmental wrongdoing.

The Greenhouse effect
The lesson that Greenhouse would have us learn is not that the system finally worked, but that it is fundamentally broken. Our representative government is under the thumb of the military-industrial complex of which President Eisenhower warned 50 years ago this year. In my actions, there were no thoughts of repercussions, Greenhouse said. My thoughts were about doing the right things for the best interest of the government.

Greenhouse eventually sent a letter to then-Acting Secretary of the Army Les Brownlee, which somehow ended up in the hands of Congressional staffers who in turn shared it with media outlets. Greenhouse said she has no knowledge of how the letter got to Congress, which suggests the possible existence of another whistleblower. Such anonymous whistleblowers deserve our thanks as well.

The following Monday after the letter was received, Greenhouse said, Lieutenant General Strock, in his introductory statements in our weekly Directors and Office Chiefs Meeting, stated: I understand we have a whistleblower in our midst, but dont worry about it because the system will take care of itself. He was letting my fellow SES and Senior Leaders know that he felt that I was a skunk in the park, which elevated their fears and their treatment of me. My top secret clearance was taken away. I was moved to a cubicle in Civil Works where I was placed on an over-hire position unknown to me. Greenhouse was demoted but told she could keep her SES rank if she retired, which she refused to do.

Greenhouse described to me the contract abuses she witnessed and explained their illegality. Appropriate laws and regulations are on the books, she said, but if contracting officials are continually intimidated and removed from their positions when they highlight improprieties our laws and regulations are not worth the paper they are written on.

Asked about the compensation she has been awarded, Greenhouse said, I feel blessed in that the best and most dedicated lawyers came to my rescue. I am disheartened because the legal process does not provide adequate protection or remedies to federal whistleblowers. I am relieved that my ordeal has come to an end and I take comfort knowing that I would do it all over again because doing whats right is a sacred duty.

A call to attention
But the problem remains. There has been a chill over the contracting and SES communities since my demotion, Greenhouse said, and many contracting folks believe if one tries to curb contracting abuse, they will not be thanked, but fired. Notice the present tense. Greenhouse is not suffering under the delusion that changing the presidents political party transforms the Pentagon.

In fact, retribution against whistleblowers has intensified under President Obama, as exemplified by the cases of Thomas Drake, James Risen, Shamai Leibowitz and Bradley Manning. A Justice Department openly taking its direction from Obama has gone to great lengths to protect and conceal the war crimes of recent years and to prosecute or punish whistleblowers. Drake was prosecuted unsuccessfully for leaking to the public information on the actvities of the National Security Agency. Risen is threatened with imprisonment if he does not betray his source or sources for a chapter in a book he published about an embarrassingly dumb and dangerous CIA attempt to infiltrate Irans nuclear program. Leibowitz, too, was prosecuted for whistleblowing. And Manning, who is accused of leaking to Wikileaks more information on what our government has been doing in recent years than has been provided by any other source, has been imprisoned for the past year, often in conditions bordering on torture, without being brought to trial.

We should judge the contributions of someone like Manning for ourselves, without awaiting a government stamp of approval that may never come or may come too late. As Thomas Jefferson once wrote, Whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government. We will not be well-informed, however, until whistleblowers are honored rather than punished.

David Swanson, a blogger and author, graduated from the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in 1997.

THE CONFERENCE IS AT http://MIC50.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sfpcjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks. I know that military spending is up 89% in 8 years of Bush.
His "Homeland Security" state that grew out of the 9/11 attacks he stood down for made that happen in the Congress. (This is how you work with Congress, btw.)

That number does not even count the 2 wars that were kept off of the books for 8 years using "supplemental appropriation" to hide the cost from the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yep
and had you heard that there's a new president who keeps raising it further?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. yes but some think all this waste is ok under a dem pres..not me
thanks for the post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Empires and Military Industrial Complexes are inherently corrupt. :-/ K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sad K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Aug 29th 2014, 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC