Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

after the GOP took over congress in '94... Clinton hired Dick Morris and

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 12:55 PM
Original message
after the GOP took over congress in '94... Clinton hired Dick Morris and
Began triangulating to the center ... ignoring vociferous protesting by the left as he signed welfare reform, NAFTA, and DOMA. He had already passed DADT and in a few years would sign the repeal of Glass-Steagle and pass the horrible telecommunications act.

Many of the same people relentlessly bashing Obama today consider Clinton to have been a great president, but Clinton was FAR to the right... in both philosophy and accomplishments ... of Obama.

Clinton triangulated to the middle and won reelection easily even with a relatively conservative electorate.

The left held its nose and voted for him, despite all the complaining.

Obama is following the Bubba model.

I said in 2008 that Obama was Clinton without the "bimbo eruptions". And he has been and is.

He'll win easily next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps someone missed the "It's the economy, stupid", that got Clinton elected in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ross Perot didn't hurt either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That's what got Clinton elected in '92.... just like it got Obama elected in '08

Clinton in 1996 was in much the same situation as Obama in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. They wish they were in the same position.
In the end, this what separates them, unemployment, and makes that strategy incredibly complicated:

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
1993 7.3 7.1 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.0 6.9 6.8 6.7 6.8 6.6 6.5
1994 6.6 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.9 5.8 5.6 5.5
1995 5.6 5.4 5.4 5.8 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.6 5.5 5.6 5.6
1996 5.6 5.5 5.5 5.6 5.6 5.3 5.5 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.4


Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
2009 7.8 8.2 8.6 8.9 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.7 9.8 10.1 9.9 9.9
2010 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.8 9.6 9.5 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.7 9.8 9.4
2011 9.0 8.9 8.8 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You're right that Obama doesn't have the benefit of the dotcom boom that Clinton had

But I meant that they are in much the same situation with respect to the opposition that they face and the strategies they must use to take them on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bubba Had A Telecom Boom At His Back. Obama Does Not.
Bubba was the last president to benefit from massive stimulus spending on tech research prompted by the Soviet threat. The internet (telecom) was a product of defense research into keeping networked computers talking to each other after an invasion or nuke attack.

Since 1981, we've spent government money on tax cuts instead of such tech research, and from the last decade until now, our economy has been moribund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. A number of major differences: #1 - The Economy, Stupid.
Newsflash: mortgage crisis worsening; 2M net jobs lost since 01/09; the Dow is going south again, and we're in 5 wars & 1 in making (Syria).

6 million Mortgages are in default or seriously in arrears, up nearly 10 percent during last year: http://www.housingwire.com/2011/08/16/u-s-mortgage-delinquency-rate-grew-2-4-in-july

4.4 million properties were classified as more than 30 days past due last month, while 1.89 million were listed as more than 90 days past due.

When looking at loans that are either 30 days or more delinquent or in foreclosure, the database has approximately 6.5 million mortgages that fit that criteria.

States with the most delinquent loans included Florida, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey and Illinois, while Montana, Wyoming, Alaska, South Dakota and North Dakota had the fewest non-current loans.

The total U.S. foreclosure pre-sale inventory rate hit 4.11% in July, a 9.7% surge from last year, but a slight o.4% decline from June.


While unemployment rebounded after bottoming out in January '09, jobless recovery leaves more than 2 million net lost jobs (source: BLS):


By this count, Obama's has been a Net-Zero presidency. Bill inherited an economy that was in far better shape, and rode the dot-com bubble before that burst. Let's give Barack this much - he's done a great job of stabilizing a status quo that really, really sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC