Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Texas Rep. tells crowd Obama impeachment ‘needs to happen,’ but fails to say why

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Playinghardball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 09:46 AM
Original message
Texas Rep. tells crowd Obama impeachment ‘needs to happen,’ but fails to say why
Source: Raw Story
By Stephen C. Webster

A Republican congressman from Texas recently told a gathering of tea party supporters that the impeachment of President Barack Obama "needs to happen," but when queried as to why, he could not say.

The comment comes from Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX), a women's doctor who took office in 2003, stepping into the seat held by former House Majority Leader Dick Armey (R). Amid a recent grilling over his vote to extend the U.S. debt ceiling, Burgess rebuffed tea party members, insisting that allowing the nation to default would have been much worse than a credit ratings downgrade, according to The Fort Worth Star Telegram.

"I didn't want the country to go through what it is going through right now," Burgess reportedly said. "It's not the president's downgrade. The downgrade affected the whole country."

That vote shouldn't have come as a surprise to tea party Republicans. In times of less dire financial straits -- namely when the Republican party controlled Congress and the presidency -- Burgess was in favor of raising the debt ceiling every time he was asked, voting yes in 2003 and in 2004, and additionally voicing support for increases in 2006 and 2007, though official votes were not taken.

More at: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/08/09/texas-rep-tells-crowd-obama-impeachment-needs-to-happen-but-fails-to-say-why/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. How do you call for impeaching a sitting POTUS
Edited on Tue Aug-09-11 09:55 AM by Proud Liberal Dem
without being able to say for what?

My guess is that he really does have "grounds" for impeaching Obama but it's just not something he can say in public.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. you are being too kind...
to this asshole...do repubs need grounds or facts to say or do something? YOUR GUESS IS FUCKING WRONG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. YOU ARE BEING TO KIND
to this asshole...do repubs need grounds or facts to say or do something? YOUR GUESS IS FUCKING WRONG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Whoa!
What did I say? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. See the Mel Brooks' classic "Blazing Saddles" and you'll know ehy
Burgess could not say. Specifically, the scene where the new sheriff approaches the town on horseback and the town crier tries to announce his impending arrival :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. The new sheriff is a near!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. You left out the
"boing" of the bell :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. No, no, dagnabbit! NEAR!
Edited on Tue Aug-09-11 12:29 PM by Ruby the Liberal
*boing*

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. ROFL!!!
I love that movie :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. I am sure many DUers...
will back this Texas Rep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. I am sure many DUers...
will be excited about this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. Is "Presidenting while black" an offense?
Edited on Tue Aug-09-11 10:07 AM by NightWatcher
Like driving while black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. Someone should let the SS know about this latest dog whistle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. Just another applause line for the tps
appetite for meaningless drivel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. Reasons? We ain't got no reason. We don't need no reason! I don't have to show you any stinkin' ....
"What, then, is an impeachable offense? The only honest answer is that an impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers to be at a given moment in history; conviction results from whatever offense or offenses two-thirds of the other body (the Senate) considers to be sufficiently serious to require removal of the accused from office." - Gerald Ford
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
14. Because OxyRush says so.




That's all the zombie Shittoheads need to know.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
16. One teabagger attendee: impeachment just to distract Obama and keep him from getting anything done.
When one attendee suggested that the House push for impeachment proceedings against Obama to distract the president and keep him from getting things done, Burgess was immediately receptive. He said Obama backed away from using the 14th amendment to raise the debt ceiling without Congressional approval because of concerns about getting impeached. He added that there's also some people who believe Obama violated the War Powers Act when he pursued military action in Libya.

"It needs to happen, and I agree with you it would tie things up," Burgess said. "No question about that."

I asked Burgess about the exchange afterward.

"We need to tie things up," he repeated. "The gentleman was right. The longer we just allow damage to continue unchecked, the worse things are going to be for us...People will talk about it."

http://blogs.star-telegram.com/politex/2011/08/burgess-puts-impeachment-on-the-table.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. That's my rep!
He faithfully represents the wealthy enclaves that dot this area, ignoring the trailer parks and older housing areas.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. President Biden
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC