Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To involve people in "Super Committee" all seats must be those up for reelection. NO SAFE SEATS!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
SugarShack Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 10:34 AM
Original message
To involve people in "Super Committee" all seats must be those up for reelection. NO SAFE SEATS!
That is why Kerry,,,is working on the Corporate Tax Holiday! Please research that HUGE windfall, while they are taking away from the people.

They have said these super committee seats will come from those in safe seats, not up for reelection. We need to get this CHANGED.

Hey Obama,...Here is some change I'd like to see.

All appointees MUST be up for reelection! Then WE have a voice too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes! You're absolutely right! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalidurga Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have an idea....
f this extra-constitutional committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SugarShack Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes! Where is the challenge to the constistutionality of this so called committee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Who is "THEY"?
I was on a DSCC call yesterday and no decisions have been made yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SugarShack Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Of course not, but papers today say it will most likely be those in "safe" seats.
This is why it should be those up for reelection!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SugarShack Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. can we keep this kicked? keep this illegal committee in the forefront?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC