Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Things the President CAN do.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:12 PM
Original message
Things the President CAN do.
There are a lot of things a President can't do. But, the Executive branch has some considerable authority in several areas. Here are a few things the President could do in an emergency situation:

1. Immediately close all foreign military bases or as many as he wished to close. Fly everyone home and just close them down. He is the Commander-in-Chief.
2. Remove all troops from Iraq and Afghanistan. Same process, start flying everyone out of there immediately. He is the Commander-in-Chief.
3. Direct the Treasury Department to temporarily stop issuing payments to any number of federal agencies. They are under the Executive Branch.
4. Shut down any agencies he wishes to which are administered by the Executive Branch. Furlough employees and turn off the lights.
5. Direct the closure of all airports which operate under the authority of the FAA. The FAA is an Executive Branch organization. Since the FAA is not funded at this time, safety issues could be cited.


All of these things could be done on a "temporary emergency" basis using no authority other than what the President has over the Executive agencies and departments. If the government doesn't have the money to fund these, then shutting them down would eliminate the need to pay for them.

I'm sure there are many other possibilities.

Now, it's almost unthinkable that he'd do this, and it would mean a one-term Presidency for him, and probably impeachment, but he could do those things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. One of those is not true.
Number one. It would take a huge amount of money and time to shut down overseas military bases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It would cost the amount to fly people home. I'm not talking
about an orderly shutdown, but an immediate one on an emergency basis. Same with the two wars. Just fly the personnel home. We'd have enough money to do that, I have no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. What about the equipment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. It's paid for already. Fly the planes back to the US. Give the
rest to the local government there. Immediate major savings on maintenance and operation costs. Load the nukes up and bring them home, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. And then re-buy everything?
Your plan is ambitious but very short sighted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Why rebuy it? If we close those bases, we won't need it.
Edited on Tue Jul-26-11 02:10 PM by MineralMan
The equipment on those bases is dedicated to those bases, other than the aircraft, which can be flown anywhere. If the bases will not be manned, that equipment is redundant. Since it has already been paid for, there is no additional cost attached to abandoning it in situ. We've done that many, many times.

I see the foreign base closures as a permanent thing. Permanent closures and permanent savings. A reduction in the size of the military comes with the process. Essential missions only. No foreign crap where we're not needed, and no adventures in nation building, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. LOL. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Same with #2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why would he?
Simply order the treasury to continue selling debt instruments and let the courts sort it out. He has to comply with the budget he's been provided by the congress and the constitution.

Shutting down government violates both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I didn't say he would. I said he could.
Agencies and departments under the Executive branch can be run by the President. Although Congress provides the authority to pay for them in the budget, they cannot tell the President how large they must be or how many people must be employed there. All of that money does not have to be spent, even though it is authorized. The Treasury Department is an Executive function, as are many agencies and departments.

Again, he will not do these things. But, they are within his authority to do. I'm making a point here. There are many things he cannot do. There are many he can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. But Germany will be utterly UNPROTECTED~!!!1!!1!!
We can't risk it. There is NOT A DIME to be cut from the military budget--it'll have to come from Social Security!

/sensible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Right. Bring everyone home and tell the Germans,
Edited on Tue Jul-26-11 01:29 PM by MineralMan
"Have fun with these facilities and this equipment. You maintain it and pay for it. See ya!"

All that crap is already paid for. We're talking about stuff that has to be paid for now and down the road. Just give the crap to the Germans. They can buy parts from us to keep it working. And so on in all those other places where we have bases. Leave them. Just abandon them. I'd take the nukes home with the troops, though. That would make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. To the extent that you are being sincere, I agree with you.
Edited on Tue Jul-26-11 01:30 PM by Romulox
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I'm being very sincere. I've long thought that all foreign bases not being
Edited on Tue Jul-26-11 01:36 PM by MineralMan
used for immediate defensive purposes should have been shut down long ago. They serve no real military purpose and are there more as a State Department function than a military one these days. Incredibly costly. Impossibly useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I've heard foreign bases put forward as "economic engines" for their host communities
which we must not close, lest we destroy the fragile economy of Glupenhöggen or wherever. It's a hard argument to stomach from here in Southeast Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Yup. That's a role the State Department should be in charge of,
not the military. Economic development in other countries is not their mission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Naval General Order #2011-14
This order would order all Naval vessels to return to their home port forthwith. On arrival at the port, the ships would be put into standby condition and all personnel given indefinite leave without pay or an immediate discharge, at the individual's option. Immediate savings of billions, with more savings down the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Furlough all the Congressional staff
Everybody who answers the phone, does mail, constituent services, schedulers, leg. aides, all of them gone.

You would see Congress members heads spin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Those are working people.
There aren't too many rich people in that bunch. Many of them are young adults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. They aren't too precious
To be laid off like the rest of us were. I know what goes on there on The Hill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Of course they're precious.
They're working people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Not anymore precious
than those of us who were laid off.

I have no sympathy whatsoever for those mollycoddled babies on the Hill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. That makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Can't do that. Not under the Executive branch.
No authority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. You like Paraprosdokians too don't ya MM??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraprosdokian

ParaprosdokianFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A paraprosdokian (pronounced /pærəprɒsˈdoʊki.ən/) is a figure of speech in which the latter part of a sentence or phrase is surprising or unexpected in a way that causes the reader or listener to reframe or reinterpret the first part. It is frequently used for humorous or dramatic effect, sometimes producing an anticlimax. For this reason, it is extremely popular among comedians and satirists.

Some paraprosdokians not only change the meaning of an early phrase, but they also play on the double meaning of a particular word, creating a form of syllepsis.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. That's why I love DU
I really did learn something new today
and I love that kind of stuff.


I think you nailed it

I thought I knew Greek culture, history, arts
but that was new to me.

Wait I need to do a search
Anyway back at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. I use them from time to time, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. Unilaterally increase the term of payment to all military vendors by 30 or 60 days.
This should save substantial money, while driving some of the more marginal suppliers out of business (hopefully).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. Here is an official page, which lists every Executive Branch
Department, organization, commission, and agency. All of these are under the direct control of the President of The United States.

http://www.usa.gov/Agencies/Federal/Executive.shtml

Many of the listings on that page lead to new pages that actually list all of the organizations. It's an extensive list. Any of them can be brought down to a skeleton or temporarily shut down by Presidential order. The savings would be absolutely remarkable.

Again, President Obama will not do this, but he has the power to do so.

He doesn't have the power to raise the debt ceiling, though, not even under the 14th Amendment.

Have a look at the lists at the link. You'll be amazed at how many things the Executive Branch controls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. What a great thread
Who is this MineralMan? By what authority does he feel he has the right to make such pronouncements?
    <<grin>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. As always, I have no authority over anything, but I can
post stuff on DU. Stuff to think about. The President has great power over many things. It's important to understand what he can and cannot do on his own. Many seem to not understand that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC