Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hmmm... Interesting Couple Of Nuggets Here...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 01:52 PM
Original message
Hmmm... Interesting Couple Of Nuggets Here...
Consolation prize: The Senate
July 14, 2011|By Joan Vennochi, Globe Columnist

<snip>

It’s unlikely that the Harvard professor and bankruptcy law expert will get to lead the new consumer protection agency she created. So, now Warren is being touted as a Democratic star worthy of taking on Republican Senator Scott Brown. It’s a combination consolation prize and rescue mission.

“Elizabeth Warren is still in the running for the consumer protection job. I hope she gets that job,’’ said Massachusetts Democratic Party chairman John Walsh.
But if it doesn’t come through, “I would love it if she were interested in joining the race. I would talk to her and encourage her in a heartbeat,’’ said Walsh, officially embracing the buzz that began with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senator Patty Murray of Washington, who also chairs the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

<And...>

This should be Obama’s fight. Yet once Republicans cast Warren as anti-business, the president was afraid to play his strongest hand: Taking on Wall Street and an economic meltdown spawned by greed and irresponsibility. In backing down, the administration lost a big chance to showcase Democrats as the party of middle-class values instead of big business.

“Did (the White House) squander an opportunity to make the Elizabeth Warren nomination a defining battle? Big time,’’ said one Senate Democratic adviser who is close to the Warren drama.


<snip>

More: http://articles.boston.com/2011-07-14/bostonglobe/29774296_1_consumer-financial-protection-bureau-setti-warren-elizabeth-warren

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. The guy she personally selected for the agency got the job.
Former AG of Ohio, a rising star in the party. The GOPers will oppose her hand-picked guy just as strenuously as they would have opposed her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wish dems had gone after wall street
It was a wasted opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, do you suppose the actual appointee is going to have an
easy time getting affirmed? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Palmer Eldritch Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. He took Warren's recommendation. If it's good enough for her, why not you?
Do you know better than Elizabeth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm Tired Of Obama Hiding From The Fight That We MUST Have...
This should be Obama’s fight. Yet once Republicans cast Warren as anti-business, the president was afraid to play his strongest hand: Taking on Wall Street and an economic meltdown spawned by greed and irresponsibility. In backing down, the administration lost a big chance to showcase Democrats as the party of middle-class values instead of big business.

“Did (the White House) squander an opportunity to make the Elizabeth Warren nomination a defining battle? Big time,’’ said one Senate Democratic adviser who is close to the Warren drama.


Same as OP.

I'm not impressed by his... timidity.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Palmer Eldritch Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You would rather have a fight that we can't win than get down to business?
It doesn't matter how Warren jhas been cast.

The votes to approve her are just not there. She would be filibustered into infinity.

Let's get somebody she approves of in there and start protecting the Consumer.

Elizabeth will land on her feet, you can count on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. They're Gonna Have The Confirmation Fight Either Way, The R's Want To Gut The Agency...
See... if Obama had stood behind Warren, and insisted that she was going to be the one, that would have signaled to many of us that he was finally taking the fight to the greedy bastards that run/ruin this country. And many of us would have picked ourselves up, dusted ourselves off, and joined the fight WITH him, because we'd all be fighting the good fight, together, over something we all actually believe in.

Now Courdray seems like a good guy, and yeah... he has Warren's backing. Great.

But at this point... I really don't give a shit any more.

The President did not pick up the banner... he did not lead the charge... apparently he does not need our help.

They're calling it the "Enthusiasm Gap"... and I am completely, utterly, unenthusiastic regarding this President.

Which BTW... for me is a 180 degree turn around from 2008.

:shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Cowardice
That seems to be the hallmark of the few, hardcore, Obama can do no wrong, apologists. You are all cowards that make Neville Chamberlain look like a medal of honor winner.

There is no victory without a struggle, only the painful ignominy of perpetual surrender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC