Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does AZ have the death penalty and, if so, does this crime meet the legal criteria

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:25 PM
Original message
Does AZ have the death penalty and, if so, does this crime meet the legal criteria
for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, and I think federal law applies to the judge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. They could let this creep plea bargain down to "life" if he tells us who the conspirators are...eom
Edited on Sat Jan-08-11 09:27 PM by Kolesar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unless they have an insanity plea
Cuz I betcha this guy uses it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes but it seems highly likely he is mentally ill.
If proven in court that he suffered from schizophrenia for example that would (and should IMHO) preclude the death penalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. If he was mentally ill he shouldn't have gotten a permit for a gun
and if he doesn't have a permit, whoever sold it to him should be held responsible for the murders.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Well no none of that is correct.
Edited on Sat Jan-08-11 09:45 PM by Statistical
The instant background check system does block mentally ill persons from obtaining a firearm. However obviously it can only block DIAGNOSED persons from obtaining a firearm. It is a computer database not a magical talisman which can detect ill intentions.

Sadly there are millions of undiagnosed mentally ill persons in this country. We have a horribly underfunded mental health system; I know my wife works in the system. Thus it is possible that he is mentally ill, AND he DID pass a background check (due to never being diagnosed).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. OK he's mentally ill and should have gotten a permit for a gun?
Yes, that's very sad that there are millions of undiagnosed mentally ill persons in this country. Sadly, that's very sad. :(

Until you can figure out a way to to diagnose them, let's take easily-available, deadly handguns off the street so these undiagnosed people can't destroy lives and families or innocent people, shall we? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. We can start by better funding mental health care.
Funding is roughly 1/8th that of other developed countries. If you think we have a health care problem in this country the mental health problem is 10x worse. However it is far easier to build prisons and push gun control that work at the real issue.

Until you can figure out a way to to diagnose them, let's take easily-available, deadly handguns off the street so these undiagnosed people can't destroy lives and families or innocent people, shall we?
I wouldn't agree to that even if it were Constitutional (and it isn't). Any Constitutional ideas you want to try?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. We didn't used to fry the mentally ill. Now, who knows?
I mean, shooting 20 people is proof of something wrong.

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. You don't know our juries. My mom was an alternate on a DP case--
the accused was demonstrably developmentally disabled and was an accessaory who actually reported the crime to a store clerk who called the police.

He was executed anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. federal court system
death or life would be the only two sentences
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes and yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddball Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. I've read they do
He probably will use an insanity plea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. Doesn't matter if they do or not
The shooting of two federal officials--the congresswoman and the federal judge--have made this a federal offense, and the feds have a death penalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. The murder of the judge meets the rare federal death penalty

I'd guess in AZ they shoot you for parking tickets, on those days when Jan Brewer isn't scouring the desert for beheadings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
14. No, it's wrong to execute the mentally ill.
Execute the 50yo Teabagger that manipulated him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RidinMyDonkey Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. I still don't favor the death penalty
This guy has a family too, who I'm sure can't ALL be nut bags. Killing him wont bring anyone else back.

I will say though, that this is probably the most I have ever considered the death penalty for anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC