Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Floodwater Seeps into Nebraska Nuke Plant Building

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:15 AM
Original message
Floodwater Seeps into Nebraska Nuke Plant Building
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/06/27-6

Published on Monday, June 27, 2011 by Associated Press

Floodwater Seeps into Nebraska Nuke Plant Building
by Nelson Lampe



OMAHA -- Missouri River floodwater seeped into the turbine building at a nuclear power plant near Omaha on Monday, but plant officials said the seepage was expected and posed no safety risk because the building contains no nuclear material.

Omaha Public Power District spokesman Jeff Hanson said pumps were handling the problem at the Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station and that "everything is secure and safe." The plant, about 20 miles north of Omaha, has been closed for refueling since April. Hanson said the berm's collapse didn't affect the shutdown or the spent fuel pool cooling.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission spokesman Victor Dricks described the situation as stable. NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko plans to inspect the Fort Calhoun plant on Monday as part of a pre-arranged visit to Nebraska.

Hanson said OPPD fired up generators and cut the power supply after water surrounded the main electrical transformers on Sunday. The generators powered the plant until an off-site power supply was connected later in the day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Here we go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, safe and secure except for the "seeping."
Just had this discussion on these boards last week about the dam at this plant and was assured by the poster in multiple posts that even though other rubber dams had leaked or burst, not this one, no, siree, no way, no how.





Told you so. Sadly. Because me being right means there's the usual horrible problems associated with this filthy and dangerous industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Sure glad everything is just fine and dandy.
Yes, I'm just glowing with optimism.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. seems
they are everywhere these days..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Remain calm -- all is well!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. & in related news: Radioactive tritium leaks found at 48 US nuke sites
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43475479/ns/us_news-environment/t/radioactive-tritium-leaks-found-us-nuke-sites

Radioactive tritium leaks found at 48 US nuke sites

'You got pipes that have been buried underground for 30 or 40 years, and they've never been inspected,' whistleblower says


Radioactive tritium leaks found at 48 US nuke sites - US news - Environment - msnbc.com

The Associated Press
updated 6/21/2011 5:48:09 AM ET 2011-06-21

BRACEVILLE, Ill. — Radioactive tritium has leaked from three-quarters of U.S. commercial nuclear power sites, often into groundwater from corroded, buried piping, an Associated Press investigation shows.

The number and severity of the leaks has been escalating, even as federal regulators extend the licenses of more and more reactors across the nation.

Tritium, which is a radioactive form of hydrogen, has leaked from at least 48 of 65 sites, according to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission records reviewed as part of the AP's yearlong examination of safety issues at aging nuclear power plants.

Leaks from at least 37 of those facilities contained concentrations exceeding the federal drinking water standard — sometimes at hundreds of times the limit.

While most leaks have been found within plant boundaries, some have migrated offsite. But none is known to have reached public water supplies.

At three sites — two in Illinois and one in Minnesota — leaks have contaminated drinking wells of nearby homes, the records show, but not at levels violating the drinking water standard.

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I have a suggestion:
'At three sites — two in Illinois and one in Minnesota — leaks have contaminated drinking wells of nearby homes, the records show, but not at levels violating the drinking water standard.'

As long as it is so safe then the water should be bottled up and Congress can drink it. They should prove to the American people that all is well and there is nothing to fear from a little Tritium in the drinking water of this country........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. seriously
that is an excellent idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I second that notion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Terrific! AND the management at those same plants need to join
in the water drinking, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. And we need video...
Of the authentication of the water source, and the drinking of said water.

But what do I know? Apparently I'm just a fear-monger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Plan for the worst, hope for the best.
Ignore those that mock you, they will be the first to change their minds when it affects them or someone they care about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Great idea. I love it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. What happened to the plant being "watertight"?
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/21/us/21flood.html
Flooding Brings Worries Over Two Nuclear Plants
By A. G. SULZBERGER and MATTHEW L. WALD
Published: June 20, 2011

Makeshift barriers — including a water-filled rubber tube eight feet high and a third of a mile long — help keep water away from the vital buildings, including the training center, the administration building and a security building. “It is an added level of protection,” said Jeff Hanson, a spokesman for the utility. “If the water were up to the plant itself, it would still be protected. The plant itself is watertight.”



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Laying waste to the first set of lies...
The new lies are coming, no worries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I'm sure they are
I wanted to be sure to document the first set of lies so they don't just fade away or get replaced.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. No safety risk; totally expected
Don't mind us; we've been planning to flee go on vacation for months now. We'll keep the situation closely monitored. Nothing to worry about. We're not a bunch of incompetents like those Japanese at TEPCO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC