Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Populations around U.S. nuclear plants soar

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:30 AM
Original message
Populations around U.S. nuclear plants soar
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2011-06-27-Nuclear-plants-population-evacuation_n.htm

Populations around U.S. nuclear plants soar

BUCHANAN, N.Y. (AP) — As America's nuclear power plants have aged, the once-rural areas around them have become far more crowded and much more difficult to evacuate. Yet government and industry have paid little heed, even as plants are running at higher power and posing more danger in the event of an accident, an Associated Press investigation has found.

Populations around the facilities have swelled as much as 4 times since 1980, a computer-assisted population analysis shows.

But some estimates of evacuation times have not been updated in decades, even as the population has increased more than ever imagined. Emergency plans would direct residents to flee on antiquated, two-lane roads that clog hopelessly at rush hour.

And evacuation zones have remained frozen at a 10-mile radius from each plant since they were set in 1978 — despite all that has happened since, including the accidents at Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima Dai-ichi in Japan...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. The distance we should keep from the nearest nuclear power plant is well established:
It's about 93 million miles.

:P

Have a sunny day!

K/R

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. and have and will cancer rates soar too


seeing as how a large percentage of the plants daily leak poisons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. They Sure Did in the Town I Grew Up In When the Nuke Went In
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. I hadn't thought of this aspect before. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. probably also attracting workers.
people in rural areas are desperate for jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm 15 miles from a nuclear plant and 16 miles from another. That's outside of the 10-mile radius
Edited on Mon Jun-27-11 10:48 AM by Phoonzang
so I'm ok right?...right?

Edit: Oh just noticed I'm 28 miles from another and 42 miles from another. So...4 within 50 miles. Buuut still out of the 10 mile radius. So...still fine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. And to counter your point, I will note that no one put a gun to their...
...heads to force these people to build there.

And in the event of an emergency, those antiquated roads remain perfectly adequate for evacuation, since in any situation where they would not be, no amount of blacktop would prove sufficient, since the contents of the reactor would be in people's laps almost BEFORE they knew there was a problem to run from.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. Radioactive tritium leaks found at 48 US nuke sites
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43475479/ns/us_news-environment/t/radioactive-tritium-leaks-found-us-nuke-sites

Radioactive tritium leaks found at 48 US nuke sites

'You got pipes that have been buried underground for 30 or 40 years, and they've never been inspected,' whistleblower says


Radioactive tritium leaks found at 48 US nuke sites - US news - Environment - msnbc.com

The Associated Press
updated 6/21/2011 5:48:09 AM ET 2011-06-21

BRACEVILLE, Ill. — Radioactive tritium has leaked from three-quarters of U.S. commercial nuclear power sites, often into groundwater from corroded, buried piping, an Associated Press investigation shows.

The number and severity of the leaks has been escalating, even as federal regulators extend the licenses of more and more reactors across the nation.

Tritium, which is a radioactive form of hydrogen, has leaked from at least 48 of 65 sites, according to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission records reviewed as part of the AP's yearlong examination of safety issues at aging nuclear power plants.

Leaks from at least 37 of those facilities contained concentrations exceeding the federal drinking water standard — sometimes at hundreds of times the limit.

While most leaks have been found within plant boundaries, some have migrated offsite. But none is known to have reached public water supplies.

At three sites — two in Illinois and one in Minnesota — leaks have contaminated drinking wells of nearby homes, the records show, but not at levels violating the drinking water standard.

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC