Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF is the matter with Ed Schultz

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:08 PM
Original message
WTF is the matter with Ed Schultz
Edited on Thu Jan-06-11 06:18 PM by Tx4obama
Hey Ed,
Rahm Emmanuel did NOT call democrats/liberals "f'ing retarded".
Rahm was referring to an 'idea' that he thought was f'ing retarded.
The Rahm bashing needs to STOP!

Edited to add:
Excerpt:
White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel earned a trip to the pillory this week after a Wall Street Journal story reported that he had used forbidden language last summer in a strategy session with liberal groups and White House aides. Emanuel, who knows his way around obscene, venomous, and cruel language called one idea presented at the session "Fucking retarded."
http://www.slate.com/id/2243728/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cattledog Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rahm was a disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. Amen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ed Schultz is fine
Rahm is a scumbag. Deserving of ANY and ALL criticism thrust towards him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. +1
and you used kinder words than I would have...I'd have thrown in backstabbing weasel for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. even if it isn't TRUE?
:shrug: I didn't think that is what we are all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. I couldn't agree more. Well posted. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Whose idea was f'ing r*t*rd*d? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. It was 'an idea' that came up at the weekly strategy session. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
43. During health care debates, a group of liberals meeting with Rahm
suggested that they would oppose health care reform vigorously because the bill as structured did not contain single payer. The former COS supposedly lost it and said that idea is fucking retarded. Except for his language, Rahm was right, the liberals were set to throw out the baby with the bath water because they were not getting everything they wanted. At the time I did not understand why liberals would behave that way until the race for governor in my state where the Greens were set to defeat an effective democratic governor and effective Lt. governor because the team did not give Greens all of their pet projects. The Greens were ready to elect a republican, f****** amazing, but other democrats and independents stepped up and buried them Greens and republicans on election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #43
48. You know who Rahm thought had real good ideas regarding health care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. YOur memories and mine are different
he did call liberals fucking retarded... more than ONCE.

And Gibbs used the lovely monicker of Profesional Left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Please post a link. I added one to the OP to back the facts. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. Took all of five seconds
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/rahm-emanuel-retarded-comment-puts-offensiveness-spotlight/story?id=9738134

Rahm Emanuel "Retarded" Comment Puts Offensiveness in Spotlight
Advocates for Disabled Equate 'Retarded' With Hate Speech

54 comments By DEVIN DWYER
WASHINGTON, Feb. 3, 2010
PrintRSSFONT SIZE:SHARE:EmailTwitterFacebookMore
White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel's verbal indiscretion -- referring to some liberal activists as "f**king retarded" -- has shined a spotlight on just how pervasive the R-word is in American conversation, and how offensive it can be for millions of Americans.


Advocates want White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel to become a leader in campaign to end use of the word "retarded."
(ABC News Photo Illustration)
Emanuel apologized to members of the disabilities rights community this afternoon at the White House for comments he made during a closed-door meeting last August but not reported until last week by The Wall Street Journal.

Here is more

The friction was laid bare in August when Mr. Emanuel showed up at a weekly strategy session featuring liberal groups and White House aides. Some attendees said they were planning to air ads attacking conservative Democrats who were balking at Mr. Obama’s health-care overhaul.

“F—ing retarded,” Mr. Emanuel scolded the group, according to several participants. He warned them not to alienate lawmakers whose votes would be needed on health care and other top legislative items.

http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/01/26/rahm-emanuel-liberals-are-f-king-retarded/

I could find more, or is this enough?

He did... it became a matter even for Palin to call for his resignation but as I said, your memory and mine are different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kweli4Real Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Suspect your memory is informed by ...
what was reported and repeated (over and over again) here; rather than, what he really said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. See above, for two stories (aka sources)
he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kweli4Real Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #31
47. I'm sorry ...
All I see is someone reporting what someone said Rahm said. Seems a lot like that "professional left" flap that got so many non-professional, though leftist folks' panties in a bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. fuck Rahm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
46. Eeeew, no how, noway,
not even in my thoughts on a good day. Just yuck. Skin is is still crawling at the thought.:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #46
52. LOL!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. rahm deserves what ever is being thrown at him.
unfortunately he`ll be running chicago/illinois in the near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yes, as long as it isn't a lie, which this is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. FDL is not a reliable source, and the other article has only a partial, out-of-context quote.
Which completely alters what he actually said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. There are plenty of more pages on the google
Edited on Thu Jan-06-11 08:59 PM by nadinbrzezinski
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. He has perpetuated that lie dozens of times on his show.
I've emailed his show about the error and he just keeps doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. Don't listen or watch? How often do you email Reich-wing shows about their lies?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. I don't watch Faux.
It's embarassing to watch Ed perpetuate that lie (just like it was/is embarassing on DU), because he's better than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #33
54. OK, let's try this another way, he's on OUR side, give him a break
and if he isn't pure enough, change the channel! Purity will not win us an election, it hasn't since the 70's, and we've been on the defense ever since.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:12 PM
Original message
Thank God someone is finally speaking out for Rahm!
/rahm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ed is on point
and Rahm is nothing but a worthless POS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Rahm Emanuel was a disaster but his replacement will be SO much better
:sarcasm: for the so much better part that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. Why does it need to stop, did he stop sucking ass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. Ed Schultz is a blowhard.
he's an alarmist reporter who doesn't bother to check facts before getting all worked up over anything and everything. unfortunately, that type of reporting is what gets ratings and it's why fox "news" is still in business. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. Can't stand Ed or Rahm and
you're right. He meant no disrespect to people who held a different opinion than his, just their idea. That's why he used the term "fucking ret***s, because ideas are fucking ret**ds but people aren't.

You spin quite well. Nice work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Sorry but you're wrong. He said ''f'ing retarded'' , not retards
See the updated edited OP above.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. I see. So that makes it ok. He's not calling me a retard
he's calling my ideas retarded. Yeah big difference.


She's not a whore she just has sex for money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. It was NOT your ideas. It was 'an idea' at the weekly strategy session . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
42. That changes everything.
Saying your idea is "f'ing retarded" means I totally respect you and value your opinions.

Whereas, saying you're an "f'ing retard" for having that idea would have crossed the line.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
39. No, he only meant to disrespect the retards, obviously.
As we all know they make excellent scapegoats for everything wrong in DC.

:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. Rahm Emmanual can go to hell
I feel terrible for the people in Chicago who will have to deal with this smug piece of shit as their mayor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. Rahm Sucks the balls of whatever animal you wish

My personal opinion is rats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bravo Zulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. Big Ed is the man,
go Ed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
26. Jeeze, we threw the baby out, can we throw out the bath water too now that Rahmy is gone?
Give it a rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
34. I love Ed. I especially love his passion. Do I always agree with everything he says? Of course not,
but Ed is a good progressive and he has a big heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #34
50. I LOVE Ed too he really speaks up for the common
working man/woman and not just the intellectual elites that so many favor. Sometimes I think that's why he gets so much flack, it's the classism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
36. The point was made
Along with the "professional left" comment by Gibbs as to exactly what that regime felt about liberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
38. Rahm bashing needs to stop?
Are you fucking kidding? That was the very first wrong pick the president made, and it was pretty much all downhill from there. If you love Rahm so much, fly to Chicago and go work on his campaign with the other DLC numbnuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
40. Rham is a weasle and a rude jerk
The fact that this President will preen about being a big Christian while surrounding himself with vulgar goniffs that use low language in not just a professional context, but in the White House, makes a display out of Obama's hypocrisy as well as Rahm's utter worthlessness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change Happens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
41. Big Eddy is a big ASS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
44. Fuch Rahm in his shrivelled little heart. He's no Democrat. And he said what he said.
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
45. Fuck Rahm, fuck Bill "NAFTA" Daley. This WH has officially moved into the disaster zone.
end of transmission
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
49. Reagan Democrats like Ed have never been accused of being the sharpest tools in the shed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
51. Nothing.
With Rahm, plenty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
53. rahm is a jerk fuck him
what a piece of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC