Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Millennials Can’t Start Their Careers And Baby Boomers Can’t End Theirs - NationalJournal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 11:33 AM
Original message
Why Millennials Can’t Start Their Careers And Baby Boomers Can’t End Theirs - NationalJournal
Upside Down
Why millennials can’t start their careers and baby boomers can’t end theirs.
Ron Brownstein - NationalJournal
Updated: June 10, 2011 | 9:06 a.m.

<snip>

It’s hard to say this spring whether it’s more difficult for the class of 2011 to enter the labor force or for the class of 1967 to leave it. Students now finishing their schooling—the class of 2011—are confronting a youth unemployment rate above 17 percent. The problem is compounding itself as those collecting high school or college degrees jostle for jobs with recent graduates still lacking steady work. “The biggest problem they face is, they are still competing with the class of 2010, 2009, and 2008,” says Matthew Segal, cofounder of Our Time, an advocacy group for young people.

At the other end, millions of graying baby boomers—the class of 1967—are working longer than they intended because the financial meltdown vaporized the value of their homes and 401(k) plans. For every member of the millennial generation frustrated that she can’t start a career, there may be a baby boomer frustrated that he can’t end one.


Cumulatively, these forces are inverting patterns that have characterized the economy since Social Security and the spread of corporate pensions transformed retirement. Since World War II, young people (including those employed part-time in school) have consistently been much more likely to work than older Americans. Federal statistics show that on average during the 1950s, the share of Americans ages 16 to 24 in the labor force (52 percent) was nearly 12 percentage points higher than the share of Americans 55 and older (just under 41 percent). By the 1990s that gap in the labor market participation rate for the youngest and oldest adults had widened to nearly 30 percentage points. At that point, Americans younger than 24 were twice as likely to be employed as Americans older than 55.

But that spread began narrowing after 2000, and it has closed with unprecedented speed during the slowdown. Since December 2006, the employment-to-population rate for young people has fallen by a dizzying 10 percentage points, from about 55 percent to just 45 percent. That decline, much sharper than in previous recessions, has reduced the share of employed young people to the lowest levels in 60 years.

<snip>

More: http://www.nationaljournal.com/columns/political-connections/our-upside-down-workforce-20110609

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Globalization creates real life problems when not managed properly.
Thank you Free Marketers. Let the Market work its will.
That invisible hand does strange things does it not???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. What can you do but shrug?
Extremely poor choices in elections, federal and local, have consequences.

Not standing up to corporations as they were taking away everything (and in some cases, defending them, as if they were ever going to be "rich someday") has consequences.

Letting Milton Friedman and his grubby influence slither into our economic ranks to stay for good like an unwanted guest who beats you with golf clubs . . . HAS CONSEQUENCES!!!

The result is Republicanized Democratic politicians and Batshit-Insane Fanatic Republican politicians running things.

This should have been nipped in the bud in the 80s if it weren't for the twin snakes Reagan and Bush I.

Hope hating "teh gays", "teh Blax", "teh lib-ruls" and "teh poor" was worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC