|
"And I know quite well you, among too many other DU'ers, preferred to take Breitbart's word from the very beginning. The fact is, for all YOU knew it could have been a hack. And yet you preferred to take a fucking scumbug's word for it."
What are you talking about? I think I maybe commented a couple of times total on this stupid story, and only to say it was obvious Weiner was lying in his round robin press conferences last week - and I was completely correct. He was obviously evasive and hiding something. From the beginning he couldn't deny the picture was him, did not refer the supposed "hack" to the authorities, and basically didn't act like a guy who had really been "pranked".
"Says a lot about you."
Let me get this straight. In your world, the people who believed Weiner was lying from the beginning because of the way he handled the situation (NOT because of anything Breitbart had to say) are somehow in the wrong? Are you effing kidding? It was so obvious Weiner was lying it had become a national media joke. I'm sorry you are so gullible that you fell for it, but that isn't my fault. Maybe you should just stop being so naive.
I don't give a crap if Weiner sent a photo to some consenting adult or not, that is between he and his family. Unfortunately, much of the public and the media DO care about this stuff. If Weiner had just said "you got me, I did send the photo, I shouldn't have, my wife is pissed, I don't have much more to say", I'd have been more than fine with that. The problem is he went around OBVIOUSLY lying. The fact that he has a (D) by his name hurts us. The fact that his scandal is eating up the oxygen we wanted to use to point out Republicans are trying to kill Medicare hurts us. For the moment, Weiner has become a liability and it did not have to be this way if he had just been honest from the beginning.
|