|
Let me start by stipulating that, under the standard economic definitions, we are not now, nor have we been, in a depression.
So, with that out of the way, can we *discuss* use of the word?
It seems to me that the word is very emotionally charged. Many of us still alive recall first hand The Great Depression or were reared by people who were so affected by it that the emotion of the term was passed down to us. The era is sufficiently close in time to still have resonance. It was, in many ways, more influential on who we are today than was World War II or Viet Nam or the various social movements of the past 50 years.
We have, today, an economic mess that is similar to The Great Depression more in the fact that it is a significant economic downturn than for any one or a series of causes. The causes are in many ways very different. The suffering is more diffuse, thanks in no small measure to the safety net that grew out of the Depression.
The effect on our individual morale, however, is quite similar. As a relative statement, many people have fallen as far from their high water mark as did people of that past era. A job lost today is no less a personal and family crisis than a job lost then. A house foreclosed now is no less gone than one foreclosed then.
There is also the fortunate (or not) coincidence that the word for a severe economic downturn is the same as for a severe emotional downturn. We my not be in an economic depression, but we are surely in a national emotional depression. (Yes, like the economic arguments, it can argued that we're not depressed, but rather, just feeling blue. But does it matter, in a practical sense?)
The national "conversation" (how I loathe that word in this context) is mired in issues at the edges. The real problems are structural and fundamental. The solutions require big, bold, brave, and maybe unpopular steps.
The banking system, as but one example, is completely broken. The tax code is, too. The government of We The People now favors itself over the people, and those who buy their way in over those who vote them in.
It seems to me that using the arguably hyperbolic word "Depression" could be like a slap in the face to a hysterical person. It seems to me it has the power to galvanize a nation to act in favor of change that helps the average person instead of favoring the privileged few.
I would be very supportive of a national leader who used the word to gather support for change that helps the average person.
What are your thoughts about the word?
|