Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Politics and the fantastic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 11:22 PM
Original message
Politics and the fantastic
Edited on Fri May-27-11 11:25 PM by Hannah Bell
A long-time socialist and member of the British Socialist Workers Party, (China) Miéville has won or been nominated for every major literary science fiction or fantasy award, and has the distinction of being the only three-time winner of the Arthur C. Clarke award. In 2008, science fiction website IO9.com called his novel Perdido Street Station one of the "20 science fiction novels that will change your life..." His latest book, Embassytown, which he describes as more definitively in the science fiction genre, was released in the U.S. earlier this month. Miéville spoke to Nicole Colson at Chicago's Comic and Entertainment Exposition in March about the role of politics in his writing, his thoughts on science fiction in popular culture and how politics and faction interact:

SCIENCE FICTION and fantasy is having a huge pop culture moment right now, yet in terms of literature, there still seems to be a real degree of sneering at it. A Booker Prize judge, John Mullan, said a couple of years ago that science fiction was "bought by a special kind of person who has special weird things they go to and meet each other."

I DEBATED him about that actually... yes, there is a great deal of snobbery about it... I think it's got a lot to do with the triumph of a certain genre that we now call "literary fiction," which has become terribly successful at pretending it is not a genre, but is in fact the definition of literature. That's the result of very powerful marketing campaign over the last 30 years or so.

But I think it does go further back than that. I think it's something to do with a shift in late Victorian and early Edwardian culture--a certain phase of bourgeois culture. Writers had done stuff across fields before then, but something shifted, and quite a strong ideology emerged of mimetic representation. There are literally books and books and books on why that is, but I think it is the result of a certain ideological moment... I don't want to be saying that the dominant ideology hates science fiction. If you look around, the dominant ideology loves science fiction. But there is a certain sense of generic hierarchies. But I also think that it's breaking down at the moment...



http://www.www.socialistworker.org/2011/05/23/politics-and-the-fantastic



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great article!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC